logo

47 pages 1 hour read

Biographia Literaria

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 1817

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 13-16Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 13 Summary

Just as Descartes, speaking as a naturalist, sought to render the construction of the universe intelligible through matter and motion, Coleridge’s “transcendental philosopher” seeks to apprehend the self within infinity (94). Wrestling with observations about the nature of space and motion, Coleridge claims that transcendental philosophy requires that “two forces should be conceived which counteract each other by their essential nature” (95). Coleridge transcribes a letter from a friend who reproves him for the length of his arguments about imagination. Thus Coleridge curtails his argument, concluding that Imagination is the “living power and prime agent of all human perception,” while Fancy is a “mode of memory emancipated from the order of time and space,” and associated with autonomy (99).

Chapter 14 Summary

Coleridge now takes up the subject of Lyrical Ballads and the friendship between he and his collaborator William Wordsworth. Coleridge devotes himself to poetry relating to the supernatural, Wordsworth to the wonders of the everyday. To this end, Coleridge wrote “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” and other unfinished works, different in kind from Wordsworth’s profusion of great poems. Some readers were outraged by Wordsworth’s preface, but soon his admirers grew numerous. Explaining his differences with Wordsworth, Coleridge firstly defines a poem and then poetry. Poetry and prose contain the same elements, but with a different objective. The object of poetry is “the communication of a truth,” which produces pleasure (102). Poetry cannot be distinguished from “poetic genius itself” (102). Ideally, the poet “brings the whole soul of man into activity [and] diffuses the tone and the spirit of unity” (102). He does so using the “power” of imagination, which is “itself the balance or reconcilement of opposite or discordant qualities” (102).

Chapter 15 Summary

Coleridge illustrates these theoretical precepts with a critical analysis of Shakespeare’s poems Venus and Adonis and The Rape of Lucrece. Their first success is versification, the second Shakespeare’s choice of subject. Revelatory of the dramatist within the poet, Shakespeare’s Venus and Adonis are vivid, their individual characteristic transcended by the poet’s own feelings. However beautiful Shakespeare’s images, they do not characterize their author but serve “a predominant passion” (106). Finally, Shakespeare’s “meteoric power […] is depth and energy of thought” (106). Lucrece allows Shakespeare to express “the deeper passions” (106) and a “yet wider range of knowledge and reflection” (107).

Chapter 16 Summary

From his examination of Shakespeare’s poems, Coleridge discourses more widely on the disparity between 18th-century poetry and that of the 15th and 16th centuries. In contemporary poetry, as in landscape painting, the focus is on the background. Coleridge contrasts this with the Italian and Flemish Masters, whose works focus on foreground. Renaissance painting focused on traditional subjects and was judged by its treatment of these. Coleridge claims that the greatest Renaissance poetry is characterized by “perfect simplicity” (111). New meters were borrowed from German, in contrast with the Greek and Roman influences on Coleridge’s peers. Only a contemporary poetic genius could “recall the high finish, the appropriateness, the facility, the delicate proportion, and above all, the pervasive and omnipresent grace, which have preserved, as in a shrine of precious amber,” certain Renaissance poems (112).

Chapters 13-16 Analysis

Having defined Imagination and Fancy in Chapter 13, Coleridge traces them through the canon of English poetry. The work of Coleridge’s contemporaries is compared with the Renaissance masters. Shakespeare is used as a measure of ultimate poetic achievement. Thus, Coleridge traces the operation of Fancy, or “memory” “emancipated from time,” a study that sees Coleridge traverse English poetic canon in these chapters (99). Meanwhile, Coleridge measures these poems’ value in terms of Imagination, the “prime agent of all human perception” (99).

Coleridge traces the interaction of these two, Imagination and Fancy, much like the back-and-forth movement of the water insect skipping upstream. The interaction of Fancy and Imagination produces a kind of dance, “like the motion of a serpent, which the Egyptians made the emblem of intellectual power” (103). Coleridge envisions the history of poetry unfolding as a snake traces “S” shapes in the sand. This metaphor is an enactment of writing and implies impermanence.

 

This interaction between the history and the living act of writing, between Fancy and Imagination, is present in the act of writing poetry for Coleridge: “poetic genius […] sustains and modifies the images thoughts and emotions of the poet’s own mind” (102). Coleridge’s image of the snake side-winding across the sand is also evocative of the hieroglyphics in Egypt, which archaeologists were in Coleridge’s time newly able to decipher, thanks to the discovery of the Rosetta Stone in 1799. Writing itself must have seemed pregnant with a magic potential for prosopopoeia. Poetry therefore involved “the flux and reflux of the mind in all its subtlest thoughts and feelings,” a kind of Heraclitan time travel (105).

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 47 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools