62 pages • 2 hours read
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Dylan Howard has “a vindictive streak” (211), Farrow is told. He has a history of sexually inappropriate behavior in the workplace, but an internal inquiry found no serious wrongdoing. Women who complain about Howard’s behavior are assigned menial tasks as punishment. Howard is enraged by Farrow’s story about his catch and kill policies and vows to exact revenge against the journalist. Soon, the National Enquirer publishes a slew of salacious, gossipy stories about Farrow. He ignores the slander and continues to report.
The media becomes more interested in AMI, and a series of reports begins to uncover the company’s nefarious methods. The FBI raids the office of Michael Cohen, Donald Trump’s personal lawyer. Cohen worked closely with Howard to kill numerous stories. AMI denies Farrow’s accusations, but when they are questioned by the authorities the executives admit to everything. They caught and killed numerous Trump stories before, during, and after his Presidential campaign. Eventually AMI and its assets such as the National Enquirer are sold for a fraction of their former worth.
Harvey Weinstein finds himself in increasing legal jeopardy. The list of women accusing him of sexual harassment or violence grows to more than 80. Old police cases are reopened, and the authorities try to reach a conviction even though they know that Weinstein’s lawyers will do everything possible to keep him out of jail. Eventually he is booked with a crime and taken to a cell in handcuffs. He posts a $1 million bail and returns home with an ankle bracelet monitoring his movements. His legal team move to discredit every potential witness and even succeed in having one of the cases dismissed. At the same time, the authorities in Los Angeles and London put together cases of their own against Weinstein.
Farrow receives a mysterious message from someone claiming to work in the world of surveillance. He arranges a meeting and is told to go to the back of a Peruvian restaurant without cell service. He sits down, and ten minutes later Igor Ostrovskiy appears with a phone filled with pictures from the surveillance of Farrow’s home. Ostrovskiy explains that he is worried that the work he did for Black Cube may have been illegal. He shares details of tactics, names, and other items of interest.
The New York authorities launch an investigation into Black Cube. An old school friend meets with Farrow and tries to convince him to act as a witness in the investigation. Farrow is reluctant because he wants to be sure that he can protect his sources.
Igor Ostrovskiy opens up about the tactics used at Black Cube for whom he subcontracted. Farrow researches and uncovers information about Roman Khaykin. He observes the surveillance operatives when they are on different jobs and continues to report on Black Cube throughout the end of 2018. He receives a message from Ostrovskiy about a pen that can record audio and realizes that some of his sources might have been recording him. Farrow learns about other operations in which such pens are used to record potentially incriminating conversations. After a botched operation which uses Israeli intelligence officers on American soil, Ostrovskiy wants to speak to the authorities. He asks Farrow to put him in touch with someone in law enforcement.
In November 2017 NBC announces that news anchor Matt Lauer has been fired for “inappropriate sexual behavior” (222). Many people at NBC claim to be shocked, and Noah Oppenheim tells employees that the complaint was professional, not criminal in nature. Rich McHugh and Rich Greenberg discuss whether NBC knew about Lauer’s indiscretions. An internal investigations clears NBC of any wrongdoing, but many employees are not convinced. Other media outlets report different versions of events and suggest that Lauer’s conduct was an open secret. Farrow speaks to women who complain of being targeted by Lauer for sex which, though consensual, made them feel awkward and sick. One story about Lauer having a button on his desk which allows him to close the door is repeated by several people. Lauer was able to trap them inside his office using the button.
The complaints suggest that NBC has numerous internal issues of sexual misconduct which were covered up with nondisclosure agreements and financial settlements. Lauer and other executives have all been accused, and their accusers often suffered professionally.
The NBC employee whose complaint resulted in Matt Lauer’s dismissal is Brooke Nevils. She received a large payment and was made to sign a nondisclosure agreement. Nevertheless, she talks to Farrow. Since leaving NBC, she developed an alcohol problem and tried to commit suicide. She claims to have lost everything she cares about. Her whole life was spent dreaming of being a journalist because she believed in “the truth” (228). While covering the Sochi Olympics in 2008, one night after work Matt Lauer approached her in the hotel bar. They drank together and after an evening of fun and pranks, Lauer sent her a message and asked her to come to his room. She went to his room and he immediately began to kiss her, pushed her to the bed, and then forced himself upon her despite her repeated pleas for him to stop. She left his room in tears. Back in her own hotel room she cried, vomited, and passed out.
When she woke up, she found blood on her clothes and her sheets. Over the coming days she was worried that she had angered Lauer. Once they returned to New York, Lauer and Nevils had two more sexual encounters at his apartment. Nevils believes these additional sexual encounters were “completely transactional” (230), and she felt she could not say no due to the influence Lauer had over her career. She told many people about her experiences with Lauer, but nothing ever happened.
Nevils explains that Farrow’s work exposing Harvey Weinstein inspired her to come forward. She filed a formal complaint and told NBC lawyers everything. When Oppenheim announced Lauer’s dismissal. the news made her vomit. NBC declared that Lauer’s indiscretions were professional rather than criminal, even though Nevils had explicitly described a rape to the NBC attorneys. The NBC characterization of her relationship with Lauer portrayed his abuse as a consensual affair and soon workmates treated Nevils with contempt. Some of them sent her abusive messages. NBC made little attempt to keep her story anonymous. Nevils felt unable to continue in her job and during the protracted dispute over her departure she “was hospitalized for post-traumatic stress and alcohol abuse” (233).
The allegations against Matt Lauer are joined by similar allegations against other media figures. Mark Halperin, Matt Zimmerman, and Tom Brokaw are all accused of sexual harassment or abuse. Andy Lack showed a pattern for killing stories which reported women’s accusations. News outlets describe a “culture of harassment” (235) at NBC, and Farrow receives messages from people familiar with the matter who suggest that the network is trying to cover up their internal issues. One of the main outlets publishing reports about NBC’s failing is the National Enquirer. Part of the success of Harvey Weinstein’s intimidation of the network was his knowledge of the nondisclosure agreements and internal problems which he threatened to reveal if the network published anything incriminating about him.
Rich McHugh deals with the fallout of the story. He refuses to toe the company line in NBC’s characterization of their failure to publish Farrow’s work. McHugh worries about his future and is offered a raise if he stays at the network. Though concerned that this is an attempt by NBC to buy his silence, he knows his contract will soon run out. Farrow advises him to take the money to support his family, but McHugh cannot do so. He resigns and gives an interview to the New York Times describing exactly how the Harvey Weinstein story was killed.
NBC launches into a frenetic defense. They release an internal menu contradicting McHugh’s story which is filled with errors and mistruths. People involved in the story give interviews disputing NBC’s version of events. NBC’s own news anchors such as Megyn Kelly question the veracity of the memo on air. The memo is part of NBC’s attempt to “rewrite the history of the story at the network” (239), writes Farrow.
Farrow begins to feel guilty that he dodged questions on NBC’s failure to publish the Harvey Weinstein story. Since The New Yorker article, he tries to focus discussion on the survivors and their stories but is repeatedly asked about the scandal at NBC. The network offers him a new deal, and Farrow is unsure if he should accept it. He needs a job and agrees to hear the network out, to see whether their claims of reformation are true. But as more time passes, more stories and rumors reach him. He cannot in good conscience work for a company and tacitly ignores its misconduct while reporting on misconduct at other networks or places of work. He tells his agent to halt negotiations.
NBC and its networks suddenly blacklist Farrow. Hosts and anchors call Farrow to tell him that his interviews were cancelled without their approval. As he puts his finishing touches to Catch and Kill, the NBC legal team reaches out to him with rumors of litigation.
Meanwhile, Oppenheim is targeted for his role in the Weinstein cover-up. Amid calls for his dismissal, Oppenheim refuses to take responsibility for any role in killing the story at NBC. He also begs Farrow to explain at some point in the future that Oppenheim is “not the villain in all this” (242). Farrow states that NBC’s internal consensus and group-based decision making is culpable for the cover-up. There is no single villain. The failing occurred on an institutional level.
Farrow repairs his relationships with his boyfriend Jonathan and his sister Dylan. Nevertheless, his work on the case leaves much of his personal life strained. Seeing the success other survivors have in telling their stories, Dylan decides to try again to tell her own story of abuse. Farrow and the editors at The New Yorker work on a new batch of stories. One of these stories is to investigate the culture of abuse at NBC. Farrow sits down to interview Brooke Nevils.
Farrow meets Igor Ostrovskiy again. The investigation work from Black Cube has stopped for Ostrovskiy because he refused to take a lie detector test. His wife recently had a baby, and he confesses that he chose to leak information to Farrow because he worried that what he was doing was wrong. Ostrovskiy started his own private investigation company with a focus on more altruistic jobs.
The final chapters of the novel turn away from Weinstein and focus on the institutional powers which allowed men like him to continue their abusive behavior for years. Matt Lauer at NBC and Dylan Howard of the National Enquirer are both important figures in the media industry. Lauer is accused of sexual assault, and NBC covers up his behavior with nondisclosure agreements and large cash payouts to the survivors of his abuse. Lauer is protected by the institution because he is a valuable commodity for the news network. The women he abuses are less valuable to the network so their accusations are dismissed or hidden. This institutional favoring of the abuser over the people they abuse is a key example of why the behavior is allowed to flourish. The abuser is simply too valuable a commodity to remove, so the institution decides to tolerate a certain level of abuse. The cash payouts to the women abused by Matt Lauer place an exact financial figure on the extent to which the network is willing to finance and forgive abuse. The figure cannot come close to expressing the trauma and suffering endured by the survivors, however, and NBC becomes the latest in a long line of institutions which repeatedly fail women who accuse powerful men of sexual assault.
Dylan Howard is important to the narrative in a different sense. His behavior illustrates another key example of why certain people are able to get away with abuse for so long. Howard is a friend of Weinstein, and he catches and kills stories for men like Weinstein and Donald Trump in order to place himself in a favorable position. In return, Weinstein is able to offer business deals while Trump can offer political favors to the man who has a safe filled with compromising stories about them. The abusers are permitted to continue their abuse thanks to men like Howard, who values the power he has over the pain and suffering of the survivors. Howard, Trump, and Weinstein ignore notions of guilt and shame. Farrow depicts them as part of the same corrupt system that values profit, male friendship, and political favors over any sense of justice.
The Prologue and Epilogue of the book provide a small slither of hope. Igor Ostrovskiy is a private detective who becomes embroiled in Farrow’s surveillance. He is part of the mission to stop the publication of Farrow’s article. But Ostrovskiy has a moment of realization halfway through his assignment. Having found himself in a moral quandary, Ostrovskiy realizes that he is part of a destructive, abusive system. He ceases his involvement in the surveillance and reaches out to Farrow to help him understand how Weinstein’s effort to suppress stories works. Igor Ostrovskiy becomes a model for reformation in a system. He rejects the old morals and believes in a better future. While Ostrovskiy’s story is only a small part of the narrative of Catch and Kill, it demonstrates the institutional change which will be needed if the problems outlined in the book are to be resolved. Only when people involved in the system refuse to profit from pain and suffering will the world change. Igor Ostrovskiy is an example of how this may be possible. His role is small but his example is important.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: