46 pages • 1 hour read
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
The novel’s title indicates the centrality of communication to the story, but much of Conversation with Friends is premised on miscommunication. This motif can most easily be seen in action between Nick and Frances, but on some level it occurs between every pairing of the novel’s four central characters. Nick and Frances’s communication is continuously stunted by the fact that neither of them wants to seem more invested in the relationship than the other. Nick is wary that too much honesty and sincerity will scare Frances off while Frances is wary that honesty and sincerity will give Nick all the power in the relationship. As a result, much of what they say to each other is sarcastic and vague.
To take one of dozens of such examples scattered throughout the novel, in Chapter 9, Frances asks Nick, “So is this just sex, or do you actually like me?” Nick replies, “I think you want me to say it’s just sex.” Then Frances narrates, “I laughed. I was happy he said that, because it was what I wanted him to think, and because I thought he really knew that and was just kidding around” (77). Here, Frances assumes a level of unsaid communication between herself and Nick that even two people who have known each other for decades might not be able to achieve. She wants Nick to think that she hopes he will say they’re just having sex, and then she thinks Nick realizes this is what she is thinking. The multiple layers of this sentiment are difficult even to parse in Frances’s narrated sentence, let alone for Nick to intuit from a laugh. Yet she assumes that he does. Likewise, he himself never answers the question of whether he likes her, yet they both move on as if the conversation has been resolved in some way.
These breakdowns are compounded by the difficulties of electronic communication. When Nick is working in Scotland, he and Frances’s email and instant message communication becomes so indirect and laden with irony and sarcasm that the eventual miscommunication leads to a temporary breakup. When Melissa sends Frances a long email after she has found out about Frances and Nick, Frances examines it for writerly affectations, suspecting that Melissa is trying to show off what a good writer she is by employing an unnecessary stream-of-consciousness style. Bobbi and Frances generally have more successful interactions over email or instant messenger, but they often use such platforms to discuss ideological topics like race or class rather than to discuss actual feelings. While all four central characters in the novel are intelligent, that intelligence sometimes gets in the way of direct and honest communication as they frequently think they know what one another is thinking when they do not.
Frances has less money than almost everyone she socializes with regularly in the novel. Nick comes from a family wealthy enough to have a vacation home, and Melissa’s career seems to be thriving, as evidenced by the couple’s elegant, expensive looking home. Bobbi condemns wealth, but she also comes from it. Even Frances’s friend at her literary agency internship, Philip, comes from money. Frances isn’t in poverty, however. Her parents usually give her enough money to live comfortably, and she benefits enormously from having almost free housing in a building her uncle owns. However, midway through the book, her alcoholic father starts forgetting to send her the allowance he usually provides, leaving her so low on funds that she cannot afford even a normal amount of groceries. While this development seems alarming, Frances narrates it rather casually, not dwelling on it as an area of anxiety.
New financial precarity affects Frances not only materially, but also relationally. She views money as a form of power, and therefore thinks of Bobbi and Nick as automatically having the upper hand in her relationships with them. She feels this acutely when thinking of the €200 she still owes Nick after their final breakup. She suddenly becomes desperate to right the power imbalance by paying back the money and spends all her free time applying for jobs so she can do this.
To cope with her feelings of insecurity about her financial situation, she projects a disdain of wealth and a moral superiority about her comparative lack of it. She, Bobbi, Nick, and Melissa all profess anti-capitalist sentiment, but only one of them feels financially strained. Melissa tells Frances toward the end of the novel that she could sense Frances judging her for her money the moment Frances first walked into her home. In Chapter 1, the reader does not witness Frances thinking judgmental thoughts about the house, but rather feeling insecure in it. She projects disdain when she feels insecurity, not just about money, but as a broader pattern. By the end of the novel, her insecurity has not vanished, but she seems closer to an understanding that disdain is not a useful strategy to combat it.
As a girl, before her parents divorced, Frances’s father’s depression and alcoholism resulted in unpredictable bouts of frightening moods. While these moods sometimes manifested in a multi-day absence or theft from Frances’s piggy bank, Frances recalls at least one occasion when it erupted in violence. After he trips on one of her shoes, he loses his temper and throws it directly at her head. It misses and lands in the fireplace, where it burns up. “I learned not to display fear,” Frances narrates, “it only provoked him.” She then adds, “Afterward my mother said: why didn’t you lift it out of the fire? Can’t you at least make an effort? I shrugged. I would have let my real face burn in the fire too” (48).
This incident with Frances’s shoe symbolizes her training in remaining unexpressive. The detachedness she displays in her relationships with Nick and Bobbi that often appears baffling and even cruel started as a strategy of handling her father’s dangerous temper. The strategy that served her as a child in a particular context does not serve her as an adult in a new context with people who love her rather than threaten her, but by that point the habit is difficult to break.
Frances equates the shoe with her own body when she says, “I would have let my real face burn in the fire too.” This enigmatic statement might be interpreted several ways, but it shows a chilling disregard for her own body even as a child. Readers find out later that Frances carries this feeling into adulthood. She harms herself after both her breakup with Nick and her breakup with Bobbi. On the days she has debilitating pain episodes from endometriosis, she attempts to go about her regular college routine with a stoic denial of her body’s condition. She thinks to herself, “I realized my life would be full of mundane physical suffering, and that there was nothing special about it” (263). This complex bundle of associations Frances has with her body cannot all be traced back to a single traumatic incident, but the shoe incident does evoke and help to shape many of Frances’s methods for moving through the world as an adult.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Sally Rooney