logo

49 pages 1 hour read

Dead Man Walking

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 1993

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 9-11Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 9 Summary

The Harveys speak to New Orleans Magazine and accuse Prejean of using them to tilt the outcome at the Pardon Board hearing. Deciding to avoid rather than confront them, she starts visiting Willie every week, along with regular visits to his mother and aunt. Willie talks about how he wished he had done more to win the favor of the warden, although his lawsuit has won some modest improvements. He claims he is ready to die but fears seeing his mother break down when the time for his execution comes. He does not fully reckon with his crime but muses: “I hope my death gives the Harveys some peace” (179). Prejean speaks to the officer in charge of death row, who bears the full weight of what he has allowed to happen, unable to tell himself that “he’s just doing his job” (180). Not long after, he is transferred to another part of the prison, retires, and dies of a heart attack.

When Willie is transferred to the death house, he asks for Prejean’s presence, unwilling as he is to make friends with the guards who will soon kill him. Willie gives interviews to several media outlets, including one where he praises Adolf Hitler and claims to have joined the white supremacist prison gang the Aryan Brotherhood. With the execution scheduled for December 28th, Prejean visits the death house the day after Christmas, and Willie asks her for a polygraph test, just to prove to his mother that he was not the actual murderer. Prejean is aware of discrepancies between Willie’s claims and the physical evidence, and she also calls him out for his reckless interviews, stating that they will lead people to “thinking you’re some kind of nut. It’s going to make it easier for people to say ‘good riddance’ when you’re executed” (187). Willie only doubles down, talking fondly about his time with the Aryan Brotherhood. The warden then arrives, who asks her about Willie’s state of mind; she tells him that Willie is oddly calm and confident, which might lead to a defiant attitude, but the warden authorizes the polygraph test anyway. Prejean holds a brief prayer session with Willie before visiting hours end.

Having pointed Willie to some Bible verses in which he might find comfort, Prejean thinks about the many people she encounters who cite the Bible to support capital punishment. She considers the oft-quoted “eye for an eye” passage (Exodus 21:22-25, reproduced on page 194) to mean that “punishment is to be meted out according to the seriousness of the offense” and that death may have been appropriate in the vastly different cultural conditions of Biblical Israel (194); but, Prejean notes, death was also the punishment or a host of other offenses including profaning the sabbath and adultery. Even so, nitpicking the Bible is a less effective argument than emphasizing the love and mercy of Christ. Prejean finds that the Church itself has diminished the effectiveness of Christ’s message by seeking secular power, especially following the decline of the Roman Empire. She finds hope in the relatively recent examples of Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr., who were nonviolent but not passive as they tried to make their societies reckon with the costs of their oppressive social practices. Revealing the true costs, monetary and moral, is the only way to mobilize the public against capital punishment once and for all, reasons Prejean.

Prejean arrives at Angola the day before Willie’s execution, finding him in jovial conversation with his mother and stepbrothers. Prejean sits and listens as they swap stories, and when the warden arrives to announce the end of visiting time for families, he hands over two pillowcases full of his possessions. When they leave, Prejean tells him that his polygraph was inconclusive, possibly because of the stress of the circumstances, but he interprets it as a failure and is upset. She pushes him again on his racism, trying to tell him about the history of systemic injustice against Black Americans and other marginalized groups, but he digs in and says he “doesn’t like people who act like victims” (204), citing his own rebelliousness in the face of death. Yet his rebellion stops short of refusing his last meal, and he eats ravenously while recounting episodes from his childhood and early forays into crime. He says he called the woman with whom he had had an affair and asked her to come, but she demurred. As night falls, the final preparations for the execution underway, Willie talks but his words lose their connectivity. He makes one final phone call to his family. With his final words, he tells the Harveys: “I hope you get some relief from my death. Killing people is wrong. That’s why you’ve put me to death. It makes no difference whether it’s citizens, countries, or governments. Killing is wrong” (211). Where her first experience with Sonnier forced her to close her eyes, this time Prejean keeps them open for the entire process.

Chapter 10 Summary

Vernon Harvey gloats to reporters over Willie’s death, saying only he died too quickly. Prejean tells reporters that all they have done is killed another person, wrecked another family. Prejean is invited for a televised interview with Peter Jennings, anchor of ABC Evening News, and despite her fatigue, she changes and hurries to the studio. The segment opens with Vernon Harvey before turning to Prejean, who is accompanied by the conservative commentator George Will (who still writes a column for the Washington Post). Prejean argues that if people were exposed to executions, they would turn against them, while Will upholds capital punishment as an expression of the public’s righteous outrage. Will and others argue that a public encounter with executions would “make a vulgar spectacle, of the most dignified event” (216), whereas Prejean strongly rejects the idea that an execution is dignified. The switch from the electric chair to lethal injections helped to create the façade of executions as a kind of euthanasia with no visible pain and suffering. Prejean is hardly in favor of bringing back public executions, but she is concerned that its sanitization obscures its brutal realities. Given the number of people exonerated from death row, it is a near certainty that an innocent person has been put to death, although some of the most fervent advocates argue that a few mistakes are worth the overall benefits of the practice.

Prejean attends Willie’s funeral, where the casket is open. His mother collapses to the floor upon viewing him. After delivering brief remarks on loving one’s neighbor no matter what, Prejean encounters Willie’s father at the burial plot and cannot get words out before she begins to cry. Prejean is invited back to Willie’s mother’s house, where she gives her two photographs of Willie, one as a child and the other as a young man, the latter inscribed with his handwriting that it is “the picture of me living every day to the fullest” (222).

Chapter 11 Summary

In 1986, two years after Willie’s execution, Prejean and others are holding a seminar on death penalty abolitionism at Loyola University in New Orleans, and Prejean is surprised to find the Harveys in attendance. To her surprise, they invite her to return to their home, and she brings a homemade apple pie, which Vernon happily eats. They tell her that they feel like they have no rights as the family of a victim, that friends and family stayed away from them lest they be forced contemplate something so terrible happening to themselves. Willie’s death provided a brief satisfaction, but Vernon “could watch Robert killed a thousand times and it could never assuage his grief” (226). Months later, Prejean again met the Harveys at the end of a protest in Baton Rouge, this time at the state Supreme Court. Despite their differences, they come together to support state funding for victims’ assistance. In 1987, Prejean meets them again outside the gates of Angola, Prejean there to support a nun whose nephew was put to death, and the Harveys there to champion the execution. Another parent of a murder victim subjects Prejean to harsh questions, but the Harveys urge her to back off. The Harveys then convince Prejean to attend the next meeting of Parents of Murdered Children, where she hears stories of unbearable suffering and grief. Prejean then works with churches to help direct resources to victims of violent crime through an organization started by her friend Dianne Kidner called Survive. Prejean also calls for the criminal justice system to incorporate principles of restitution for victims as well as punishment for offenders. She argues that abolishing the death penalty can actually free up the money and time for actual crime-prevention measures, which have paid great dividends in large cities of states without capital punishment.

By 1989, Vernon Harvey is recovering from heart surgery and starts talking about how he wants executions to be gruesome and public. Over the following years, Kidner’s support group grows and caters to an overwhelmingly Black population, unlike the all-white group the Harveys are part of. In 1991, Prejean attends a meeting of Kidner’s group, again overwhelmed by the sheer ubiquity of horrors that people in the poorer communities of New Orleans face every day, often with little help from the police. Prejean seeks to build connections between Survive and her own death penalty abolition group, Pilgrimage.

Prejean ends the book by returning to Lloyd LeBlanc, the father of one of Pat Sonnier’s victims. Prejean and LeBlanc had maintained contact over the years, although his wife did not approve. After testifying at the Pardon Board in favor of Sonnier’s execution, his conscience came to haunt him, and he started praying for Sonnier and his family. When Gladys Sonnier was dying, Lloyd went to visit her. Prejean and Lloyd meet at a chapel, and they pray the rosary together. He tells Prejean that he only went to the execution to seek an apology, not to take pleasure in his death. He still feels tremendous agony over the loss of his son, and anger toward Sonnier, but his prayer at that moment is one step on the long journey toward forgiveness.

Chapters 9-11 Analysis

These closing chapters emphasize Prejean’s awareness of the moral complexity that surrounds the issue of capital punishment. Throughout the book, Prejean is clearly troubled by her often-tense relationships with the families of victims. Her job is to provide ministry for those in need, and these are people in desperate need of help, probably for the rest of their lives. Yet once Prejean decides to become a spiritual advisor, which she understands to be a logical extension of her ministry, it becomes extremely difficult for her to straddle both sides. A priest could theoretically hear confessions from two people speaking about one another with at least an illusion of anonymity, but in the adversarial proceedings of the Pardon Board, Prejean took the side of the condemned against that of the victims’ families. While she immediately followed up these proceedings with conciliatory gestures, and received a surprisingly favorable response to her entreaties from the Harveys, it was difficult for Prejean to avoid being part of a zero-sum competition for support between two parties, both of which had a demonstrable need for it.

While Prejean made her choice to engage in prison ministry, especially as a way to protest against The Injustice of the Death Penalty, she is careful not to view the outrage of victims’ families as simply angling for revenge. The more Prejean learns about them, the more she realizes that the death of their loved one was just the beginning of their agony. As the Harveys tell her,

[T]hey figure the one killed is the victim, not you, and you’re pushed to the sidelines. You and what your needs are don’t even count and you can call them until you’re blue in the face and they won’t call you back. Some are understanding, but not most of them. They’re too busy prosecuting the criminal to be concerned about the victim’s family (224-25).

Prejean might take issue with their objections to the killer having rights (as established in the Constitution) or their desire to see him die, but she comes to realize that they too are victims, not just as the indirect victims of a terrible crime, but as people fed through the dehumanizing process of an execution. The elaborate legal architecture surrounding a looming conviction, and the enormous media attention that comes with it, forces grieving families to become public figures whose entire persona revolves around a traumatic event and its endless reverberations. For Prejean, the great lie of an execution is that it will bring finality to it all, not just the pain but the exposure and agonizing waiting for a conclusive result.

Prejean’s reflections on the families of victims also presents a closing perspective on the theme of Christian Mercy Versus Christian Legalism; Prejean finds that it is only the path of mercy that can bring anyone solace in the face of crimes like Willie’s. Vernon Harvey constantly said that Willie’s death would bring him satisfaction, and in its immediate aftermath, he is jubilant before the cameras, pouring a drink and even asking a reporter to dance (212). But with death, the punishment ends as the pain endures, and with no object, the Harveys pain curdles over the years, relitigating a death that was not painful enough for his satisfaction. There is no easy answer—the Harveys insisted that Willie was a lethal threat to those around him, even behind bars, and so they may have lived in fear had he served life in prison without parole. The fact remains, however, that death is not restorative. It only disperses the pain, especially to the families of the condemned, who can’t walk outside without someone wondering how they allowed a murderer to emerge from their home.

On the way back from a meeting of victims’ families, including the Harveys, Prejean thinks of a phrase from the Catholic prayer ‘Hail Holy Queen,’ “mourning and weeping in this valley of tears” (231). Whether in the housing projects of New Orleans or the support groups of the suburbs, Prejean’s work puts her in direct contact with incomprehensible suffering. Even if she should succeed in reducing and ultimately abolishing the death penalty (Louisiana has only executed two people in the 21st century, the last being in 2010), it would still not prevent the horrible crimes that land people in Angola while inflicting generational trauma on multiple families. While it might have a positive material impact, abolition is ultimately an assertion of Christian Mercy over Christian Legalism, a declaration that, as a society people, ought to emphasize love and redemption over revenge.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 49 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools