40 pages • 1 hour read
The novel opens with a brief transcript from the grand jury. The narrator, Andy Barber, explains the context: In April 2008, he was subpoenaed to appear by Assistant District Attorney Neal Logiudice. Andy reveals that, when he was ADA, he mentored Logiudice. Now, Logiudice is questioning his former boss, trying to get his grand jury to indict someone. Andy is confident this jury will not comply: “The truth was not going to be found out, not with evidence this stale and tainted” (5).
Nonetheless, Andy has taught Logiudice well, and the new ADA persists in aggressive questioning despite the weakness of his case. While Andy does not disclose the subject of the grand jury investigation, he reviews the details of a crime from a year before. In 2007, when Ben Rifkin was killed, Andy declined to excuse himself from the case even though his son, Jacob Barber, was a classmate of Ben’s. Andy asserts that “there was nothing improper” (7) about his decision. He tells Logiudice that he is happy to testify because he wants the truth to be revealed. However, he confesses to the reader that that is a lie: He does not believe the court system is effective at revealing the truth.
Andy returns to the event from one year prior, opening on the Rifkins sitting shiva. Ben’s death has shaken the town of Newton: Former urbanites have settled in the Boston suburb because of its safety, which has now been revealed as a fiction. Andy’s wife, Laurie Barber, exchanges condolences with other mothers, while Andy wanders, less at ease with crowds and aware that many wish to question him on the investigation. Getting his coat, Andy encounters Ben’s father, Dan Rifkin, who asks about the murderer’s motive and wonders what separates a murderer from a regular man. Andy tells him that killers are not philosophers and are mostly “full of shit” (15), making themselves the victims. He encourages Dan to get help. That night, Laurie tells Andy it is too soon for the kids to return to school; she is worried about Jacob’s safety. They have a lighthearted argument and go to sleep.
Andy goes to wake Jacob for school and hugs him while he sleeps. Jacob mutters “no, no” (22). Andy comforts him, taking pleasure in his role as a father. When Jacob wakes up, his parents ask him about his feelings. He does not divulge much, telling them he “doesn’t know” (25) how he feels and doesn’t want to talk. In the parking lot, the family encounters a group of moms. Andy expresses pride in Laurie’s esteemed role in the group; she is “everyone’s confidante” (27). Nonetheless, he feels excluded because he believes the mothers, including Toby Lanzman, think he’s boring. The group discusses how little influence parents actually have over their children and their fates. Andy leaves to help a young girl, Sarah, get a vulgar sweatshirt through the school’s heightened security, telling the cop no harm will come of it. He knows he has annoyed the supervising cop, so he stands by him for a while to show him “whose team [he is] on” (33).
Andy has the feeling there is something wrong with the case. There have been no leads in five days. He reviews the details: Ben was found dead in Cold Spring Park by a jogger, Paula Giannetto; Ben was facedown, so Paula turned him right side up, discovering three symmetrical stab wounds in his chest; the only clue is a fingerprint stamped in blood on Ben’s sweatshirt tag.
Paul Duffy, a state trooper and Andy’s good friend, arrives with a possible lead: a pedophile, Leonard Patz, lives near the park. Andy instructs Duffy to pick him up. Next, Lynn Canavan, the district attorney, asks Andy to recuse himself (possibly at Logiudice’s request). She asks Andy why he hasn’t interviewed Ben’s schoolmates. He insists that the parents have made it difficult. He requests that Lynn back him and states that the interviews will start the next day.
Jumping between 2007 and 2008, these chapters are replete with mysteries: Who killed Ben Rifkin? What does the narrator, Andy, know about his death? Who is the subject of Logiudice’s grand jury investigation? Andy’s involvement in the case has led to the end of his tenure as ADA, but the reason is unknown at this point.
This section also provides clues about Andy’s character. In Chapter 1, he is convinced of his mastery over Logiudice. In the next three chapters, he is convinced that he has the good judgment to oversee a high-profile murder case and denies any conflict of interest, even though the victim attended his son’s school. In short, he is confident—or perhaps arrogant—and does not hesitate to present himself as such. While he also characterizes himself as a loving husband and father, some of his own statements belie this characterization; in particular, he places much focus on his wife’s former beauty as the spark that keeps their relationship alive today.
From the outset, the narrative sets up Andy as an unreliable narrator. As a former ADA, he knows how to “lure, trap, fuck” (5) a witness—but he also knows how to be a witness and evade these traps. He tells his former mentee Logiudice that he wants the truth to come out because he believes in the court system and its justice, but he tells the reader that this is not the truth. He has no faith that the process of a trial decided by a jury arrives at the truth, or at justice, in fact calling trials a ritual.
As the details of the case are disclosed, it is clear that Andy fails to achieve justice for the Rifkin family. Later chapters will describe where else his judgment errs, leading to his dismissal from the DA’s office.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: