logo

63 pages 2 hours read

Endgame: Inside the Royal Family and the Monarchy's Fight for Survival

Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 2023

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Public Versus Personal Lives of the Royals

The members of the British royal family are among some of the most well-known and recognizable people in their country, with their lives frequently providing content for the British media. Just like any other celebrity, the royals have public personas that may or may not match up with their personal selves. However, their ability to manage both these aspects of their lives is crucial to the health of the institution they represent.

The Queen exemplified the need to keep one’s personal and public lives separate. She remained an enigma to the public for the entirety of her life and reign, disappearing into her royal role completely. This is partly why she remained beloved: By never publicly expressing her personal opinion, she was able to rise above all controversy, relatively untouched. The next generation of royals has not managed this same separation, and they have suffered for it. Charles has been torn between his heart and his duty all his life. The public has always known his true feelings, whether it be toward political and environmental causes or the women in his life. Andrew has been a more extreme example of the same failings. His complete prioritization of desire over duty is seen in his many ill-advised personal associations and business dealings. Charles’s and Andrew’s actions, especially compared to the Queen, have contributed to lowering public approval of the royal family. Charles, in particular, is rated lower than both his mother and his son by the general public.

Another set of royals that has experienced negative public perception because of their private lives include the Sussexes and the two women in Charles’s life. Their stories illustrate how The Public Versus Personal Lives of the Royals intersect with the theme of The Intricate Dynamics of Image and Power. Camilla, Harry, and Meghan have all experienced public backlash when their personal lives became fodder for the tabloids. Diana was the exception, as in some ways she took control of her narrative: She shared her trials and struggles openly with the public. However, Diana’s candor was also well received by the public because of the preexisting perception of her as the beloved “people’s princess.” Ultimately, all these stories saw different conclusions. Camilla’s silence, and her willingness to adhere to the royal adage of “never complain, never explain,” appealed to the Palace, which actively helped rehabilitate her public image. Diana and the Sussexes, however, were punished for pushing back and refusing to be silenced. Diana’s narrative has been rewritten by the royal family after her time, while the Sussexes continue to face negative press long after leaving the Firm.

William is perceived to be the future of the monarchy. This is not only because he is younger and feels more relevant, but also because he has been successful in cultivating the right public persona. Reportedly a short-tempered and emotional person in private, William has nevertheless consistently appeared in public as a calm, composed, consummate professional. This separation between personal self and public persona has also led to some sublimation of William’s private self, inevitable with the institutionalization he has experienced over his lifetime. His dealings with the media, open statement about his mother’s paranoia, and fractured relationship with Harry are all signs of how his attitudes and beliefs have changed over time.

The lives and experiences of the different members of the royal family thus display the need for the royals to either keep their personal and public lives separate or sublimate their private selves completely into their royal roles. Failure invites punishment from both the public and the Firm, as it threatens the influence of the monarchy.

The Monarchy’s Struggle for Relevance

Scobie derives the title for his book from Samuel Beckett’s play. In the final and eponymous chapter of the book, Scobie also quotes it, likening the existential crisis in the play to the royal family’s situation: “The question of how to endure in a hostile world is also their existential predicament” (368). Scobie believes that the royal family is fighting to survive in the contemporary world, and the monarchy’s struggle for relevance emerges as one of the book’s central themes.

Queen Elizabeth II’s death marked a significant moment in the royal family’s history, signaling a new era for the British monarchy. The Queen was Britain’s longest reigning sovereign, and the vast expanse of life experiences combined with her enigmatic presence rendered her largely beloved to the nation. This allowed the Queen to successfully draw on sentiments of patriotism, tradition, and nostalgia to keep the monarchy relevant and influential. Especially since the next generation of royals are thus far unable to command the same love and respect, the Queen’s passing undeniably brings change to the monarchy.

However, the challenges the monarchy is facing are not new; the Queen’s death is only a catalyst and not the cause of the institution’s struggles. For instance, Jamaica declared its intention to remove the Queen as head of state in early 2022, when the Queen was still alive. Barbados carried this out mere months after her passing. Both these incidents show that the Commonwealth realms have been pushing to weaken ties with Britain. This republican sentiment is present closer to home as well, with the movement intensifying in both Scotland and Britain. Economic and political factors are at play here: Scotland is looking to rejoin the EU after Brexit, which has intensified the United Kingdom’s isolation and economic woes. Concerning the latter, the royal family’s astronomical cost to taxpayers, especially given the country’s economic situation, is yet another strike against the monarchy.

There are other systemic issues rooted in the country’s colonial history that threaten the monarchy’s relevance in the contemporary world. The Sussexes’ exit from the Firm and their subsequent revelations showcase some of these issues: The hateful reportage and vitriol that Meghan experienced, coupled with the Palace’s refusal to help, or even acknowledge the situation, underlines the unconscious bias and racist attitudes still present at the heart of the institution. Meghan is not the only example of this; there is also the incident with Ngoni Fulani and Lady Hussey, alongside the presence of all the racist imagery and colonial loot that continues to populate the palaces. There has been no clear effort to introspect and make reparations for historical wrongdoing on the part of the Firm. For a younger generation looking toward a more open and diverse Britain, this attitude casts the monarchy in a bigoted and anachronistic light rooted in white privilege and irrelevant to the country’s future.

The monarchy’s struggle for relevance is rooted in multiple factors: Britain’s waning global power and economic situation; systemic issues within the institution itself; and public perception surrounding the members of the royal family (as seen in the themes of Public Versus Personal Lives and The Intricate Dynamics of Image and Power). Endgame is ultimately an attempt to examine whether the royal family will be able to navigate this challenge successfully or not in the new era.

The Intricate Dynamics of Image and Power Within the Royal Family

The royal family is an institution that largely relies on sentiments of nostalgia and tradition to keep its relevance alive. Without real political power or the ability to concretely influence policy and decision-making nationally or globally, the monarchy’s real power is “soft” and seated entirely in image and perception.

Symbolism is a huge part of the machinery the monarchy employs to keep its appeal alive. Endgame is bookended by two significant events: The Queen’s funeral and Charles’s coronation. Scobie reflects on the personal import of both of these events. With the former, he is surprised by the impact the Queen’s passing has on him. With the latter, he reminisces about the other significant events that have taken place at the site of Charles’s coronation, including his first royal engagement: William and Kate’s wedding. All of these reflections are instigated by physical symbols. Scobie ponders the intertwining of history, mystery, and tradition when he spies the crown, orb, and scepter atop the Queen’s coffin. Similarly, the wooden throne in Westminster Abbey drums up feelings of nostalgia. The Firm’s repeated use of these physical objects in pageantry and ceremony has invested these concrete symbols with the power to evoke strong positive feelings toward the monarchy. Over her lifetime, the Queen herself transformed into a national symbol, able to mask and distract from the country’s decline.

The kind of power that the Queen held during her lifetime highlights the importance of image control and reputation management to the royal family. As the royal courtiers are responsible for this, they hold immense power and can influence significant events. Sir Edward Young was able to prevent Harry from seeing his grandmother; Young’s allegiance was to his principal, and his priority was protecting the image of the Crown. Many believe this only intensified the Sussex saga. However, it is not uncommon for the Palace to sacrifice relationships for the sake of image. Simon Case exploited and widened the rift between William and Harry to prop up William’s image as the responsible and industrious brother. Despite William and Harry’s failing relationship, Case was still perceived as successful. The Crown and its heirs’ image is more important to the Palace than relationships because the former holds the power to strengthen or destabilize the monarchy.

This in turn explains the symbiotic relationship between the Palace and the press. The royals’ lives become content that sells tabloids; the Palace, in turn, needs the press to help portray and reinforce a certain image of the royal family. Thus, there exists an “invisible contract” between the two, with the Palace allowing conditional access and information via the royal rota in return for largely positive reportage. This is complicated by the competition and rivalry between the different factions of the Palace. Thus, information is also gathered via anonymous sources, leaks, and off-the-record briefings, in addition to unethical methods of intimidation, obstruction, and interference. In order to squash the stories about Rose Hanbury and William, courtiers ensured that a string of negative stories about the Sussexes was fed to the press. William’s image as the heir takes priority over Harry’s as the “spare,” and as long as the tabloids receive sensational stories that draw customers, they are satisfied.

For the royal family, image is power. The right image helps keep the monarchy alive and relevant; the wrong image weakens its position and threatens its very existence. Because of this, the royal family continues to employ the use of pageantry and ceremony, and the services of its courtiers and the media, for image management. However, entrusting these responsibilities to the courtiers and the media gives these respective entities a degree of power over the royal family. Thus, the intricate dynamics of image and power within the royal family extend to those working for and outside the institution as well.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 63 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools