50 pages • 1 hour read
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
An affluent university invites Lotto and three other playwrights to be speakers at a symposium on the future of theater. Lotto makes a mess of his opinions on women, coming off as a misogynistic narcissist by commenting that women’s roles as wives running the households of creative geniuses, and having these geniuses’ children, are just as valid as the artist’s creative work. Lotto doesn’t care about the audience’s response but worries when he realizes he’s messed up with Mathilde, when he was actually trying to compliment her. She walks out upset in the middle of the lecture.
Lotto wanders around to escape the wrath of the luncheon feminists and finds himself starving at a strip mall, with a lost wallet and no phone. He discovers he is without money only after eating lunch and dines and dashes. Having only ever memorized his childhood home phone number, he is forced to call his mother and have her tell Mathilde he lost his phone. This contact sets Antoinette on a downward spiral, as she loves her son almost too deeply, even if Lotto is blind to it.
Lotto makes the impulsive decision to walk the thirty miles back to his hotel room in San Francisco. He arrives around midnight, bloody, battered, and sunburnt. He tells the desk person he was mugged, rather than explain his day. He makes it upstairs to Mathilde and falls asleep quasi-angry that his botched speech didn’t make more of an outcry, as the previous symposium’s Nobel Prize winner had come out as having plagiarized half his speech and that event stole Lotto’s media spotlight.
Lotto dramatizes the experience of finding his classmate, Jelly Roll, dead, and his talk with the dean afterwards. However, the fictional dean’s moral takeaway is a lot more inspired and introspective of Lotto’s heartfelt womanizing rather than what transpired, and the scene ends with far less tears than it did in real life.
Lotto writes more gently-veiled characters of the significant people in his life, including his aunt, mother, and sister. Rachel comments that he is perhaps too truthful in showing his family’s personal flaws, but praises her brother for depicting their mother in a softer light.
Lotto’s writing rides the edge a bit too hard when he uses Mathilde’s personality for a character who ends up being a murderer in his play. It hits too close to home for Mathilde and they have an argument that leaves Mathilde hysterical. Lotto incenses her even more when, at a reunion, he presents an anecdote of Mathilde’s as his own. Mathilde’s jealousy over Lotto’s popularity bubbles over. With his play, Eschatology, Lotto finally receives his first positive review from critic Phoebe Delmar, who usually pans most writers.
Ariel creates a memorial gala for the Vassar group’s college friend, Natalie, which all the main players left attend. Chollie bribes a young waiter with $200 to “accidentally” spill wine on Mathilde, so she must leave the table. The waiter is intrigued not just because of the notoriety of Lotto’s career as a playwright, but for the mythic allusions another waiter makes about his former love life. The young waiter does as he is instructed and apologizes to Lotto’s pants despite not getting wine on anyone but Mathilde.
While Mathilde goes to the bathroom to clean herself up, her old boss, Ariel, hovers at the table in order to drop a bombshell that he was also Mathilde’s first boyfriend. Ariel states he was Mathilde’s first sexual partner for maximum shock value in exposing the truth of Mathilde’s past. This, above all else, sours Lotto’s long-held belief in Mathilde’s purity. One of the founding beliefs of his marriage to her was that she had saved herself for him and that he was saving her. He can’t look at his wife the same way again. Chollie’s plan goes off without a hitch. When Mathilde returns, she notices something is different in the air, despite Lotto flexing his acting chops and trying to pretend nothing is amiss.
Lotto returns to his mother’s house six months after her death, unable to comprehend what to do about Mathilde. Still reeling from the news that his wife had been her former boss’s mistress, Lotto’s perception of her role in their love story “had turned itself inside out” (195).
Lotto goes for a run to clear his mind and returns to investigate his abandoned childhood home. Haunted by the recent turn of events in his real life, he also feels haunted by his mother’s presence within the house. Turning to the boardwalk, all of the terrors he’d felt in his marriage come crashing back: Lotto worries about not really knowing his wife and being consumed by her loneliness. He swims out into the sea, delirious, under an ominous night sky. Lotto paddles too far out and dies, never making it back to shore. (This will turn out to be what Lotto was thinking about, when he died of aneurysm while sitting in his chair, in his studio.)
Lotto’s luck seems to fluctuate based on the power of his words, as his “words have more weight than most people’s” (174). Though Mathilde is referring to his career and public image in saying this, what she is really referencing is not the general public but Lotto’s supreme influence on Mathilde’s life.
Mathilde doesn’t care what anyone thinks of her besides her husband. When he devalues Mathilde’s contributions to their marriage in defending a woman’s worth solely through childbirth—and also by attaching her personality to a murderess in one of his plays, when he depicts his own, flawed mother (and Mathilde’s mortal enemy) through rose-colored glasses—she takes these instances as harsh criticisms. The more care and consideration he put into his writing and his conversations with Mathilde, the more successful Lotto was in his career and in his marriage.
Lotto and Mathilde’s final breaking point doesn’t come from Lotto putting his foot in his mouth, but rather from a different set of powerful words—those of Ariel. Though Lotto was very promiscuous before he met his wife, his ideal of her cannot comprehend that she had been with even one other person besides himself and for any other reason besides love. He finds her actions far less considerate as she slept with someone for money, rather than love. Lotto is under the false belief Mathilde kept this information from him, when, in actuality, he assumed things about her all on his own.
Because both Lotto and Mathilde lack trust in each other, their marriage ultimately fails. Mathilde is emotionally distant, and Lotto can’t stay faithful to her emotional needs. Lotto becomes physically distant once he believes Mathilde wasn’t faithful to him physically. Thus, their partnership crumbles right before Lotto’s death, without a chance for the two to reconcile.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Lauren Groff