40 pages • 1 hour read
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
As the title suggests, Smarsh uses this chapter to explore the American idea that poverty is shameful. Society usually views being poor as a personal failure, because the American Dream assumes that anyone can succeed through hard work. Failure to succeed—poverty—must therefore be the result of a personal failing. Smarsh also points out that being poor and white is seen as a worse kind of failure, since white people have certain racial advantages. As a result, wealthy whites tend to hate poor whites as if their failures reflect badly on the entire race. Thus, poor whites are more or less invisible in popular culture.
This invalidation presents as internalized shame such that poor whites often refuse to apply for welfare and hate the idea of “handouts” more than anyone. They feel more ashamed of accepting help than of needing it. In many ways, society has monetized this shame—imposing restrictions on welfare assistance that favor banks, for example. The justification for these costly restrictions is the perception that the poor make worse decisions than the wealthy. However, the reality is that “the poor just have less room for their errors, which will be laid bare in public for need of help” (130).
Still, society’s view that welfare is shameful has been internalized. Betty once admitted to being on welfare for a few weeks but was incredibly ashamed of that fact. Smarsh points out that the perception that people in welfare programs are lazy is untrue, citing the fact that she and her brother benefited from assistance programs at school even though their mother worked extremely hard.
On a personal level, Smarsh recalls understanding that her existence was resented—both by her mother, whose teenage pregnancy caused many of her life’s difficulties, and by society in general. She was often told how much worse her mother’s childhood had been, just as society is quick to point out how much more difficult the lives of previous generations were. The implication is that one should be grateful, since it could be worse. However, Smarsh also understood, even as a young girl, that she was not worth less for being born poor in Kansas. In fact, “class, like race and all the other ways we divide ourselves up to make life miserable, is what I’d later learn is a ‘social construct.’ That’s what my family calls bullshit” (136).
Due to the fact that the poor stand to lose more for any error or mistake, there is a heightened awareness in the low-income community of the financial cost of mistakes. For example, a speeding ticket might not cost much for many people but could spell financial ruin for someone living paycheck to paycheck. This awareness results in a mindset that is focused on failures and the dangers of failure, rather than on achievements. For example, Smarsh is shocked on one occasion that Arnie calls her smart; acknowledging achievement is simply not done.
In another example, Smarsh is moved into the gifted program at her school, but when she tells other people about this success, she is scolded by Betty and told not to brag. While failure in the impoverished community is shamed, so is achievement because it sets a person above their peers. As Smarsh explained in a previous chapter, there is a distrust in the poor community of anyone with more power or opportunities than they have.
Smarsh recounts memories of going with her grandma Betty to her job at the courthouse where she counselled people on probation. Betty’s hard life makes her ideally suited for this job because she herself is a survivor. She has faced down bullies and abusers, found ways to care for her children, and kept herself safe—all within a system and society that is more or less stacked against her. So, the “tough love” approach she takes with her charges is calibrated to help them survive within the law and the same system she navigates.
Smarsh witnesses something similar with her father and Chris, the woman he married after he divorced Jeannie. Nick was always a kind man, but Smarsh sees the pressures of his life, including his poisoning by his employer, cause extreme stress as he continues to work hard and continues to struggle. Similarly, though Chris cares for her father, Smarsh sees her struggle through drug addiction; even as she overcomes her addiction and helps others through theirs, her friends and society in general see her past as a personal failure of will.
Additionally, Smarsh struggles with her own issues related to the contradictory perception of poverty and shame. She developed a shoplifting habit as a girl, which she knew objectively was wrong; however, she also felt that the money system that prevented her from buying her coveted baseball cards was wrong, too. She was brought up to believe that the world owed her nothing, which she understood, “but it also seemed the world wouldn’t give me anything that I didn’t reach out and grab for myself. To do so, though, was both a mark of moral failure and something that could ruin my life, if I got caught” (157).
To emphasize how clearly impoverished communities, internalize shame and place the blame for their situation on themselves, Smarsh tells the story of winning a speech contest at her school. The subject was the War on Drugs, and her speech was entirely about how avoiding addiction was a personal responsibility for everyone. Although her family’s lives were evidence that personal responsibility is only half the story, they were all extremely proud that she won.
Finally, Smarsh acknowledges that her own success in life seems to support the “American narrative of a poor kid working hard, doing the right thing, and finding success” (166). However, she points out that much of her success is due to blessings in her life, like her kind father and Teresa’s encouragement. Additionally, she explains that her invention of August helps her make decisions, as she asks herself what she would want for her daughter.
In this section, Smarsh explores what “house” and “home” meant to her and her family when she was growing up poor. Her parents, Nick and Jeannie, are both tied to houses through their work as a carpenter and a real estate agent, respectively. Their skills mean that they often live in houses that look nicer than they are. Both are also sentimental about houses, believing that they represent more than shelter—they are spaces for souls and things of pride. Houses mean “security, safety, stability, structure, home. All the things they valued more for having lacked. All the things they were never quite able to give me” (172).
For most of America, houses are symbols of economic pride, of success rather than the failure of poverty. Jeannie enjoys her job helping people move out of trailers and apartments into homes because she feels she is helping them step up in the world. However, Jeannie is also realistic about the real estate market and moves to new houses without looking back, making herself at home wherever she is.
This attitude is the result of the fact that Jeannie’s whole family lived transient lifestyles. The combination of poverty and untreated mental illness in Betty’s mother Dorothy meant that the family moved often as Jeannie was growing up. Smarsh details how her great-grandmother Dorothy moved herself and her three daughters—Betty, Pud, and Polly—to many different towns and many different homes. Sometimes they would live in rundown hotels while trying to save for a house. At least one of these was filthy and dangerous.
Betty inherited this transient sensibility as she married young and began moving around. Although she lived in ugly places, she was always admired for her beauty. In all, she had seven husbands and moved dozens of times. One of her marriages was to Bob, an abusive man who got her pregnant and hated her young daughter Jeannie with a passion. Betty left him before her son Bo was born but ended up bouncing back and forth between homes and men.
After Bob, she ended up with Johnny, and the pair of them seemed to move almost weekly. Meanwhile, Bob married a teacher and came after Betty, seeking custody of their son, Bo. Bob’s more stable lifestyle meant that he was awarded full custody, especially since the judge shamed Betty for her poverty and the fact that she had three ex-husbands at the time. Frightened that Jeannie would also be taken away, Betty sent her to live with her brother, Carl, who lived a middle-class life in Michigan. Although she was more economically comfortable there, Jeannie hated her circumstances in Michigan and was relieved to come home to her mother in the end. Once Betty found a sense of stability, she also attempted to fight to get Bo back. However, she found it was a losing battle, as Bob was well established in his community and Betty struggled to jump through the many, many hoops.
Jeannie, in turn, inherited the habit of moving frequently from her mother. When she left Smarsh’s father, she ended up with a man named Bob who lived in a middle-class neighborhood. He would often deride Jeannie’s impoverished background, which made her act out. Smarsh was young and living with them at the time; she came to resent her mother’s behavior. Eventually, she went to live with her grandma Betty, continuing the cycle of impoverished women moving frequently and often away from their families, when she was only 10 years old.
Smarsh points out how the location of the home also dictates the location of one’s school. Living a transient life means, for children, changing schools often and usually in the middle of the school year. This prevents children from developing a sense of belonging, which Smarsh argues is a fundamental human need.
The housing bubble bursting also affected the family. Jeannie, the realtor, lived on credit and inadvertently contributed to predatory lending practices, thinking that she was helping low-income families. Nick, Smarsh’s father, bought and then lost a house, so was forced to move back to a trailer. This was particularly hurtful to Nick, as he believes honest work should result in fair profit.
The lack of stability many in poverty experience can have positive effects, like heightened adaptability. For example, Smarsh’s mother was able to be sentimental about houses, but could also make any house into a home. Smarsh asserts that people living in poverty realize that “the body is the only permanent home, and even that one comes with an eviction notice” (202). As an example, she describes the difficulty of living in tornado country when often all they could afford was a mobile home. Trailers make residents instantly more vulnerable to dangerous weather, as they lack basements or foundations and can be swept away much more easily than a house.
Smarsh ends the chapter describing in detail her decision to move away from her family to live with Betty and Arnie. She recalls being reminded constantly that children are supposed to live with her parents, so she feels a new kind of shame for the fact that she didn’t. The instability of a poor life often separates families, often for the good of the children, but that doesn’t make it hurt less. The result of this instability is that Smarsh grew up treasuring security—which is different from shelter. She describes how she loves to renovate houses using the skills her parents taught her.
In this section, Smarsh explores the ideas of shame and stability, and she shows how deeply both are rooted into America’s understanding of poverty. Society as a whole views material wealth as success, and so poverty is a kind of failure. This is reinforced in every aspect of popular culture such that the impoverished internalize this shame. This keeps anyone from attempting to fix a flawed system, as they are too focused on trying to fix whatever they believe is wrong with themselves.
This paradox in which those in poverty are set up to lose is exacerbated by public policies and laws that are designed to discourage people from getting the help they need. Decades of politics and marketing spin have made welfare such a shameful concept in America that many people who are eligible for these benefits do not collect them. Modern society is set up to humiliate the most economically vulnerable populations, to punish them for being poor even though they work hard in the hopes of escaping that life.
Worse still, Smarsh details policies that are designed to create profit from poverty. Although she never goes so far to say that evil intentions put these policies in place, she does effectively argue that the cyclical nature of poverty is systematic. The people on both sides of the economic divide are the same, but the outcomes vary wildly depending on whether politics and society determine a group to be worthy of opportunities.
Also in this section, Smarsh explores the theme of what “home” means. Traditionally, the home represents stability and safety; for poor communities, this is not the case. Since the impoverished move frequently to try to find new opportunities, there is no sense of stability—especially as they are often living paycheck to paycheck. Additionally, many live in “mobile homes,” a misnomer for dwellings that are flimsy, lack foundations, and are vulnerable to outside damage.
However, just as the shame of poverty is internalized, Smarsh shows how her family accepts a transient lifestyle without stability. They expect to move around, pursuing work or relationships. Again, this lack of physical stability makes it difficult for poor people to find any sort of opportunity that would allow them to create longstanding economic stability.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
Business & Economics
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
#CommonReads 2020
View Collection
Common Reads: Freshman Year Reading
View Collection
Contemporary Books on Social Justice
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
Memoir
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Poverty & Homelessness
View Collection
Pride & Shame
View Collection
Sociology
View Collection