logo

54 pages 1 hour read

Intimacies

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2021

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 8-11Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 8 Summary

The narrator assists Amina in the translator booth during a high-profile trial to prepare to take over her position when Amina goes on leave. The deposed president of a West African country is on trial for refusing a peaceful transition of power after his defeat in the election. In response, he formed paramilitary groups and incited genocide, which led to civil war. Despite his crimes, he remains popular in his home country, and many of his supporters are in the courtroom gallery to witness the trial. Amina warns the narrator that the trial has been more theatrical than most, but she states that the translation work is relatively straightforward. When the defense counsel enters the courtroom, the narrator notices that Kees is part of the team. His appearance in the courtroom shocks her because despite Adriaan’s assertion that Kees is a skilled defense attorney, Kees’s behavior at the cocktail party makes it impossible for the narrator to understand how anyone could respect him. She wonders why Adriaan never mentioned that Kees worked at the Court and realizes that Adriaan knows little about her work life. This leads her to reflect that perhaps she and Kees have more in common than she and Adriaan do.

The accused pridefully enters the courtroom and begins a tense conversation with the defense team. She can tell that he and Kees are having an argument, and the accused raises his hands as if to say that he doesn’t want to hear any more. The presiding judge begins the proceedings, and Amina translates effortlessly. The first witness takes the stand and makes a statement to the courtroom, claiming that the deposed president shouldn’t be on trial and that the entire proceeding is a sham undermining the authority of the Court. The gallery erupts in loud cheering, to which the president responds with great emotion and demonstrative hand gestures. The judge asks the accused to cease the theatrics and calm his supporters, as this behavior isn’t permitted. After 90 minutes of testimony, the narrator takes over the interpretation for the second half, and she is concerned that Kees will recognize her voice. Her voice wavers enough for everyone in the courtroom to notice, but Amina squeezes her hand for comfort, smoothly getting her through the session. As the courtroom empties, the narrator notices an excited buzz running through the attendees after the courtroom drama. The president exits the courtroom, deflating as if the performance has taken all his energy. Amina and the narrator go for coffee, and she tells Amina about her connection to Kees but assures her that it isn’t a conflict of interest. 

Chapter 9 Summary

After one week, Adriaan is still in Lisbon, and although he messages her often, the narrator is disappointed that he never calls. She enjoys staying in his apartment and only returns to hers a few times. Meanwhile, the deposed president’s legal team calls the narrator to interpret for a private session. Kees is there but doesn’t appear to recognize her from their earlier meeting. The president speaks to the narrator in French and thanks her for attending the conference, stating that Kees’s French is not good. The narrator listens and interprets as the legal team lays out their long-term plan for success, with the consideration that the trial might drag on for years. The lawyer emphasizes the importance of maintaining control of the daily court record in order to create a cohesive narrative instead of a persuasive one. He suggests toning down the theatrics as they are not helpful to the team’s overall goal. For the narrator, interpreting in this situation is far different from interpreting in the courtroom, and she feels the growth of an uneasy intimacy with the president as she whispers in his ear. The president listens without emotion or reaction, and she is uncertain how he feels about the lawyer’s suggestion.

As the meeting drags on, the narrator loses herself in the interpretation and realizes that she is focusing so much on precision that she has lost the thread of meaning. Attempting to reconnect to the throughline in her notes, she notices words like “mass grave” (117), which remind her of the president’s crimes. Kees suggests that they take a break, but he remains in the room with the narrator. He remarks that she looks familiar, but the narrator says nothing, fearing that Kees will dismiss her from the case if she reveals their connection. He thanks her for responding to the request to translate on short notice and then derisively asks if she has heard from Adriaan recently. Before she can react, the rest of the meeting’s attendees return. As she continues translating, the president motions toward her notes and says that seeing all the accusations on the paper makes it appear worse than it is. She tells him that her job is to ensure that no translation loses meaning. As she continues translating, she observes that the president is unaffected by the discussion of his transgressions and realizes that he likes her because he thinks she does not judge him for his actions. For him, she is “a consciousness-free zone into which he could escape, the only company he could now bear” (121). This realization makes her want to run from the room, but she stays and continues translating.

Chapter 10 Summary

It has been a month since the narrator has seen Jana, who is busy preparing for an art opening at the Mauritshuis. The narrator attends the opening, which is entitled Slow Food (123); the title is meant to be ironic. Uninterested in mingling with wealthy patrons, the narrator sneaks off to her favorite part of the museum, which contains more interesting and engaging permanent installations and paintings. She notes the intimacy in the paintings and sees the human portraits as conveying “the weight of time passing” (126). A painting from 1631 by Judith Leyster titled Man Offering Money to a Young Woman or “The Proposition” captures her attention. It features a man grasping a woman’s arm as he tries to gain her attention, but the woman’s resistance is palpable. The narrator notes the artist’s skill at capturing the tension in the moment and reflects that it portrays “two irreconcilable subjective positions: the man, who believed the scene to be one of ardor and seduction, and the woman, who had been plunged into a state of fear and humiliation” (129).

Jana approaches, and the narrator hopes that she will not ask about Adriaan. Though the narrator remains at his apartment, she senses a shift in the situation as Adriaan's trip to Lisbon has now extended beyond a week. She also relates another circumstance that has left her doubting their relationship status. After a different meeting with the president’s defense team, Kees caught her in the hallway and asked if she was okay since Adriaan had run off to Lisbon to try to win Gaby back from her lover. Before she could even recover from the shock of Kees’s question, he asked her out for a drink, and she quickly made an excuse to leave.

The narrative returns to the present. Jana is distracted by several people who want her attention, so she doesn’t ask about Adriaan. She introduces the narrator to her friend Eline, whom she invited to the opening, and leaves them alone. As they continue admiring the art, Eline, an art history professor at the university, notes the irony of the Dutch empire's creation of so much compelling art even as they were pursuing imperialistic endeavors. When the two women reach the buffet dinner, Eline notes that they have curated the scene to resemble two Greek works of art by Zeuxis and Parrhasius. As guests reach for their food, they become part of the art as if they are reaching inside the painting. Jana joins them later, and they both praise her for the impressive banquet display and the success of the opening. After Eline leaves, Jana tells the narrator that she and Eline met after the mugging that occurred in front of her apartment. Eline is the sister of Anton, the bookshop owner who was attacked. Jana relates that one week after the mugging, Eline returned to the crime scene. Jana took her to a café to calm her down, and she learned that Anton had been in the hospital for a week and was recovering, but the police still had no leads on a suspect. Now, Jana half-heartedly asks the narrator about Adriaan, but the narrator evades the subject. When she gets back to the apartment, she sends Adriaan a frank message asking about the status of his marriage.

Chapter 11 Summary

Adriaan ignores the message, and as the reality of the situation begins to set in, the narrator feels foolish for remaining in the apartment and entertaining the hope that he will return. She places some blame on herself, claiming, “I had been complicit in my own erasure” (141), since she has done little to make the apartment hers. Meanwhile, Jana arranges a meeting with Eline and the narrator because the two got along so well at the art opening. The narrator and Eline meet at a coffee shop, and the narrator doesn’t let on that she knows Eline is Anton’s sister. Eline sips herbal tea, citing her difficulty sleeping, and the narrator wonders if it is a result of Anton’s attack. Eline elaborates that she has been an insomniac since childhood. They speak briefly about the narrator’s job at the Court. The narrator tells Eline about the complexities of her job and explains that she often loses track of the proceedings while focusing so intently on the translation. Her internal monologue reveals that she continues to serve as a translator for the defense team’s private meetings with the deposed president; she has become increasingly uncomfortable with this position. She has also noticed that her colleagues treat her differently, and despite the forced intimacy of the meetings, no one other than the president speaks to her, making her feel invisible.

Eline has two children that she co-parents with her ex-husband. Anton is her twin brother and is very close with the children, acting as a father figure. Eline worries about the world’s political climate, including the Brexit vote and the contentious United States election. Eline must leave abruptly to pick up her son, but she invites the narrator to dinner with her family and brother. When the narrator tells Eline that she is an only child, Eline appears to consider her differently. After Eline leaves, the narrator imagines that she has received a phone notification, but there is nothing, and Adriaan has now been ignoring her last message for a full week.

Chapters 8-11 Analysis

Naturally quiet and contemplative, the narrator holds a job that exacerbates her sense of agency even as it effaces her identity, for her task is to speak other people's words. As a result, she rarely speaks up for herself, even in her personal life. Until this point in the narrative, she has remained a fully passive bystander, and rather than initiating events, she stands by as things happen to her. However, in these chapters, she begins weighing the costs of her habitual inaction and realizes that even the decision not to act represents a choice. This beginning of her journey away from passivity also sheds light on her efforts to succeed at Navigating Power Imbalances in her personal life. To this end, her first decisive action is to confront Adriaan about the status of his marriage. Although he doesn’t respond, the narrator’s decision to open the door of communication on the subject marks a turning point for her in the relationship as she moves to recalibrate the uneven balance of power.

At the same time, the narrator becomes involved in the Court’s newest high-profile case and is ever more deeply immersed in the trial of a once-influential political leader who retains much of his charisma. Although he has been deposed, the former president maintains a commanding presence in the courtroom, and his defiant, proud attitude challenges the Court's power to bring him to justice. Just as the narrator perceives the dangers in the president’s dynamic persona, her sense of reality is also increasingly unsettled by Kees’s unexpected appearance in her professional life and by his deliberately off-putting actions.

Interpersonal closeness often comes with increased empathy, but as the narrator’s experiences in the Court bring her into a more intimate understanding of the president, the novel implies that feeling an excess of empathy holds considerable hazards. In speaking the president’s words, the narrator is confronted with his crimes, and to do her job well, her interpretation must embody him. This arrangement results in an uncomfortable level of forced intimacy with an individual who has allegedly committed heinous crimes against humanity. The trial setting therefore offers a glimpse into the recurring theme of Intimacy and the Search for Authenticity. As the deep, probing judicial questions seek to uncover whether the president is guilty of the crimes, they also force the narrator to examine what she believes to be the truth. For the narrator, her closeness to the accused, especially in the private defense team meetings, is an unexpected consequence of her job. As an agent of the court, she sees herself as a neutral observer. Yet, even behind the protective glass of the interpreter’s booth, she begins to understand the weightiness of her position, and she cannot help but become emotionally invested in the president’s fate.

The motif of forced intimacy continues when the narrator attends the Slow Food art installation and Jana foists Eline on her without warning. Despite being forced to spend the evening with a stranger, the narrator bonds with Eline over their preference for the permanent art exhibit. Significantly, the scene implies that the museum is a place of comfort for the narrator, offering her a sense of hominess that she doesn’t experience in any other structure in The Hague. Just as the narrator finds a sense of home in the museum, she also experiences a greater sense of connection with the artwork than she does with most people in her life, and her approach to the artwork mirrors her approach to people in general. For example, the narrator describes her intimate interaction with the art and feels close to the subjects posing for portraits. As in real life, the narrator experiences conflicting feelings in this regard, for she simultaneously wants to voyeuristically stare into the other person’s world, but she also feels as though she is violating it. This feeling peaks as she beholds “The Proposition” painting, for she imagines that she is peeking into a private moment of unspoken danger. She also feels a kinship to the woman in the painting, who is forced into an uncomfortable situation with a man that echoes the narrator’s own experience when Kees wrapped his arm around her waist. Thus, she begins to comprehend the fact that sexual harassment is an act of violence. While the narrator considers the personal impact of the art, Eline is more interested in its broader historical and cultural significance. Thus, the scene reveals that the narrator’s way of viewing the art reflects her habit of too narrowly interpreting the world around her.

Discovering that Eline is Anton’s sister brings the narrator into another complicated interpersonal relationship. Though she enjoys Eline’s company, the uncomfortable subtext of the narrator’s knowledge of the crime looms ominously over the budding friendship. It also raises the question of whether the narrator’s intentions are pure or whether her decision to spend more time with Eline is born of her obsession with understanding the crime. The narrator thinks that she has intimate knowledge of Eline’s family because she knows that Anton was attacked, but as Eline reveals portions of her story, there are still many unresolved details, and once again, the narrator is left holding only a partial understanding of the circumstances. 

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 54 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools