50 pages • 1 hour read
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
As the title of Lines of Courage suggests, Nielsen’s novel explores different ways courage is found by its characters. Throughout her story, each of the main characters faces adversity brought on by the war, and their actions in the face of danger and injustice define their courage. As this book falls into the middle grade fiction genre, all the protagonists are teenagers, and the novel charts their coming-of-age alongside their development of courage.
This courage takes a different form for each character, but it is always accompanied by the awarding of Sergeant Baum’s Golden Cross of Merit, which Nielsen employs as a symbol marking bravery. Felix must overcome his guilt and shame to become a war hero; Kara must listen to her own moral compass when saving lives; Juliette must overcome loneliness and obstacles without giving up; Felix must endure the tragedy of war and loss before he can find peace; Elsa must reevaluate her loyalty to her country and recognize injustice.
In short, the narrative emphasizes the importance of small, individual acts of peaceful heroism guided by personal morality over patriotic violence. Additionally, it suggests that courage is developed through adversity, rather than being an innate quality. Major Dressler conveys a central message about finding courage when speaking about the symbolic Golden Cross of Merit:
Medals are given to those who show exceptional courage. But do you know? Most of the people who receive them will claim they are not courageous at all. They will only say they were in a terrible situation and made the best choice they could. [...] At some point, each of you found yourself in a terrible situation, and you responded with courage, with honor, and with kindness (326-27).
Lines of Courage explores the consequences of anger and empathy during times of conflict, including when facing poverty, hunger, or danger. The novel champions the use of empathy over anger, showing how anger fuels war and how empathy, though possibly more difficult to maintain, has the power to resolve it. Additionally, the structure of the novel reinforces the importance of empathy: The story is split into five sections, each seen from the point of view of a character on a different side of the war: Felix is Austro-Hungarian, Kara is British, Juliette is French, Dimitri is Russian, and Elsa is German. Nielsen suggests that, without empathy, it would be impossible for people from such disparate backgrounds to cooperate with each other. Each of them faces adversity brought on by the war but chooses to act with justice and compassion.
This theme is first introduced by the juxtaposition of Captain Garinov and Felix’s mother’s respective advice. On the one hand, the Captain tells Felix: “There’s a lot of anger in you, boy. That is good. Anger is the fuel of war and you will need plenty of it to survive” (43). However, as Captain Garinov is an antagonist at this stage in the novel, his message is to be taken with suspicion. On the other hand, Felix’s mother later states: “There is a fire within each of us. If you fuel that fire with anger, it will burn all your happiness. But if you fuel it with courage, then the fire will give you strength to do difficult things. [...] Anger will not get us through this war. Anger is the war” (45). This dichotomy emphasizes the importance of courage and compassion in times of conflict, and depicts anger as the antithesis of courage.
Kara, for instance, realizes the importance of compassion while taking care of soldiers: “Kindness and humor were tools of nursing, as much as a bandage or a brace. She cared for their injuries, but she was healing their hearts too” (65). She also goes against her orders not to help enemy soldiers by bringing an injured Sergeant Baum on board, a moral action that ends up costing her her position on the ambulance train. She reflects that: “Perhaps he fought for the enemy, but he wasn’t her enemy” (115).
Kara’s sentiment is later echoed by Elsa, who tells Dimitri: “It’s too bad our countries are at war. I think we might’ve been friends” (263), prompting him to respond: “You and I are not at war” (263). At the end of the story, when the five protagonists are reunited, Kara announces the official end of the war by stating: “As of twenty-three minutes ago, we can officially be friends again” (322).
Captain Garinov especially exemplifies the consequences of letting oneself be driven by anger. In reaction to his cruel, authoritarian behavior, Dimitri promises himself that he will not let anger control him. However, at the end of the story, Captain Garinov realizes that he has been unfair and apologizes to Dimitri before helping to rescue Major Dressler. His character arc suggests that compassion is more powerful than anger, which can only lead to violence and bitterness.
As the title of the novel suggests, history is made up of the intersection of individual lives and the major events that influence personal actions. The narrative draws “lines of courage” between the protagonists, emphasizing their connections to one another through the ripple effects that relatively small acts of compassion have on others. The symbolism of the Golden Cross of Merit makes this especially evident, as the medal is traded between all of the main characters, linking the ways in which their courage and selflessness manifest. As Juliette points out, “Life is messy. [...] It’s a line that moves in circles, and weaves itself into the circles that others have created. Our lines should be messy because that’s how our lives connect together” (322).
In addition, the narrative focuses on characters from different nationalities and different sides of the war. Their individual lives are impacted both by the historical events they are experiencing, such as Felix witnessing the assassination of the archduke, or Dimitri fighting at Verdun, and by their respective countries’ histories, such as Elsa’s belief in the superiority of the German Empire. The young protagonists’s relationships can be viewed as an allegory for the war itself, playing out on a smaller, more human scale to elicit an emotional response in the reader.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Jennifer A. Nielsen