18 pages • 36 minutes read
The narrative in “Race” is Great-Uncle Paul’s decision to pass in 1930. Passing (presenting as white) is a choice that Black Americans and other racial groups make to avoid the social and legal consequences of racial discrimination. Passing existed in the United States because any nonwhite ancestry, regardless of degree, was enough to make a person subject to racially discriminatory laws that had an impact on professional, economic, and social opportunities until passage of civil rights laws during the 20th century.
Paul likely becomes “fundamentally white” (Line 3) because he wants a professional opportunity not available to him otherwise. Although Paul’s passing may be motivated by a desire to be a forester, Alexander’s choice of the word “fundamentally” (Line 3) indicates that his choice goes beyond an economic one. Paul chooses Oregon over New York, placing him as far away from his family members and Black community as possible. These places are symbols of certain kinds of racial identity. Oregon is a state that to this day has a white-majority population due to racial exclusion laws that existed from its founding. Oregon is thus a symbol for whiteness. Harlem, New York, is a symbol for modern Black identity. Paul chooses a home and wife that make him white, although doing so requires a series of betrayals.
When “[t]he poet imagines Great-Uncle Paul / in cool, sagey groves counting rings in redwood trunks” (Lines 14-15), it is an effort to incorporate Oregon forests as a geography where a “pale” but still “black ancestor” (Line 14) can be. Oregon is associated with pioneering, making this imagined Great-Uncle Paul a trailblazer who disrupts the otherwise all-white space with his presence. Alexander inserts the gaze of Paul’s “ivory spouse” (Line 18) to show that what Paul looks like—his color—has no relation to a reality other than the eye of the beholder. The fact that Paul can shift racial identities by marrying his wife, going to the East, or being in the company of siblings with Black spouses shows that racial identity is fluid and depends on context.
Elizabeth Alexander’s work reflects the influence of the Black Arts Movement on Black creative expression since the 1960s. The Black Arts Movement has its roots in the Harlem Renaissance, when writers such as Langston Hughes engaged in critical and creative works that celebrated Black culture. The political and cultural context of that sharing was one in which the arts were a potential source of racial inclusion and racial harmony for diverse audiences.
Proponents of the Black Arts Movement of the 1960s and 1970s shifted those contexts by creating art directed at Black audiences. Whether white readers/observers of Black art liked Black art or treated Black people better because of their experiences with Black art was beside the point: Black art was for Black people. Art could be a source of liberation, resistance, connection to African ancestry, or even healing for a racial community and families scarred by centuries of racism. Works of the Black Arts Movement showed the influence of Black and African storytelling traditions, celebrated important Black historical figures and events, and centered art as a practice that could create the political conditions needed to throw off white oppression and internalized racism.
Black women writers and others shaped by that movement critiqued it because it sometimes represented Black identity as a monolith by ignoring intracommunity differences such as gender; others pointed out that devaluing Black art without explicit political messages impoverished Black artistic expression. “Race” is in conversation with that critical work. Alexander includes themes and details one would expect to find in a work informed by the Black Arts Movement. Her poem is about a Black “ancestor”(Line 14), one who engages in potentially “heroic moments” (Line 14) on “behalf of the race” (Line 15). The poem features a family story, one likely passed down orally among those “[m]any have told” (Line 12). Paul’s choice to return home initially restores a Black family to wholeness when Paul becomes once again a “brother” (Line 13).
The last stanza of this poem includes an implicit critique of the Black Arts. Rather than reinforce a settled notion of race and Black identity, Alexander represents race as a “strange thing” (Line 26) that sometimes defies commonsense representations. Paul’s story of passing so he can occupy a role prohibited to Black people sits uneasily beside stories of resistant Black ancestors such as Harriet Tubman, but it is indeed part of Black history, albeit one that is frequently “not told” (Line 21). In addition, the Black family in the poem is one that fractures in the contest over its racial identity. Alexander uses her art to represent Black identity, but her work unsettles assumptions about race.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Elizabeth Alexander
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Equality
View Collection
Fear
View Collection
Hate & Anger
View Collection
Loyalty & Betrayal
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
Poems of Conflict
View Collection
Poetry: Perseverance
View Collection
Pride & Shame
View Collection
Safety & Danger
View Collection
Short Poems
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection