49 pages • 1 hour read
Content Warning: This section depicts abuse of women.
Reading Lolita in Tehran opens with Azar Nafisi, a professor of English literature, introducing the secret book club she founded in Tehran in 1995 with a handful of female former students from her university teaching days. The girls come from different backgrounds and ideological persuasions, yet Nafisi brings them together for two years to read and discuss works of literature, with a special focus on English literature.
Nafisi compares two photographs that were taken in 1997 of her standing with her book club participants, just before she immigrated to the United States. In the first photo, the women are all wearing “black robes and head scarves” in accordance with the Islamic regime’s edicts (4). In the second photo, they have removed their robes and reveal their own individual style in clothing and hairstyles.
Nafisi says that the purpose of her memoir is “to celebrate our reading of Nabokov in Tehran, against all odds” (6). She describes their weekly morning meetings in her home, providing some insights into the personalities and individual circumstances of her book club participants, whom she often refers to as her “girls.”
Nafisi alternates between discussing the camaraderie and freedom of her secret book club with the repressive atmosphere in Iran under the post-revolutionary Islamic regime. She describes the heavy restrictions placed upon women, including the female teachers and students of her university teaching days: the daily inspections of clothing before being allowed to enter campus, and the forbidding of running upstairs, wearing make-up, or even laughing aloud. Nafisi details the regime’s attempts to suppress all traces of individuality in the name of their ideological ideal: “[M]y girls had both a real history and a fabricated one. Although they came from very different backgrounds, the regime […] tried to make their personal identities and histories irrelevant” (27-28).
The secret book club is born out of a desire to maintain something of individuality and intellectual freedom. Nafisi writes—“like Lolita, we tried to escape and create our own little pockets of freedom” (25). Nafisi contrasts how she and her girls approach literature and how the Islamic regime views it: Literature is a source of freedom, humanity, and open-ended exploration of ideas and experiences for Nafisi and her girls; for the regime, literature is only worthwhile if it conforms to, and promotes, its own fundamentalist ideology. Nafisi discusses at length how Nabokov’s novel Lolita reflects the abuses of power and what it is like to live under a totalitarian regime.
Nafisi also recalls the conversation when she first persuaded Yassi, one of her girls, to join her secret book club. She speaks to Yassi about a mysterious figure called “the magician,” who she tells Yassi is a character in a Nabokov story, but later reveals to the reader is a real person in Tehran. Nafisi describes the magician as “a gifted writer and critic” who has withdrawn entirely from public and professional life since the installation of the Islamic regime (33). Living in a small apartment, he keeps contact with “carefully selected visitors” from Iran’s cultural scene (34). Nafisi credits the magician as being “as dangerous to the state as an armed rebel” due to his principled non-compliance with the regime (34).
Nafisi recalls some of the debates that erupt in her secret book club, especially concerning moral issues like adultery. She also describes an unusual morning when her house is invaded by officers from the Revolutionary Committee, who engage in a shoot-out with a man they are trying to arrest on her neighbors’ property. Nafisi and her family are nervous the entire time, not just because of the shooting but because they, “like all normal Iranian citizens, were guilty and had something to hide […],” their “satellite dish” (64).
Nafisi ends Part 1 with an account of how one of her girls, Sanaz, gets arrested by the Revolutionary Guards while having a weekend with friends by the Caspian Sea because the “morality squads” object to the social mixing of young men and women (72). Sanaz is given “twenty-five lashes” as punishment (73). Nafisi compares her experiences as a young woman in pre-revolutionary Iran to the experiences of her girls, writing that while she and her contemporaries “had a past to compare with the present” and know what freedom is like, her girls have never known what it is to be free: “This generation had no past” (76).
Part 1 of Reading Lolita in Tehran introduces some of the memoir’s important figures and key themes. Above all else, Part 1 is structured thematically around Nabokov’s novel Lolita, with Nafisi focusing on the ways in which Nabokov’s writing reflects the essence of living in a totalitarian regime and suffering from the abuse of more powerful people. Lolita provides a way for Nafisi to introduce both the political realities of her situation and the role literature plays in the lives of the secret book club’s participants.
Nafisi describes the Islamic regime as wishing to be all-powerful, with the regime’s attempts at control infiltrating everything from education, culture, and private, individual life. Nafisi invokes the figure of a “stern ayatollah, a self-proclaimed philosopher king” (28)—an allusion to Ayatollah Khomeini, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran. She depicts him as a dreamer run dangerously amok, one who is trying to “re-create [the Iranians] in the image of [an] illusory past” (28).
The Ayatollah’s obsession with constructing an ideal Islamic society renders Nafisi and her girls “the figment of someone else’s dreams” instead of individual people in their own right (28). Nafisi stresses how thoroughly the regime infiltrates a person’s sense of self, making it difficult to maintain a sense of identity that is truly one’s own. For young women like Sanaz, sexuality is strictly controlled, as the incident with the Revolutionary Guards and her subsequent arrest illustrates: While in detention, she and her friends are “given virginity tests” twice, as the morality guards wish to police even their intimate lives (73).
For Nafisi, being caught up in a totalitarian regime’s grip poses a special dilemma concerning resistance. As the memoir progresses, she will continue to wrestle with Individuality Versus Totalitarianism, and how far, or in what ways, she can comply with the regime’s edicts without fundamentally compromising her own values and sense of self.
In Part 1, she describes the secret book club as an important source of resistance. The club gives the women a space where they can talk and think freely, a place where they can “rediscove[r] that [they] are also living, breathing human beings” (25). Nafisi draws a parallel between the women and the character of Lolita in Nabokov’s novel, writing, “like Lolita, we took every opportunity to flaunt our insubordination: by showing a little hair from under our scarves […] falling in love and listening to forbidden music” (25-26). In describing these seemingly small but important acts of “insubordination” against the regime, Nafisi suggests that anything that manages to preserve individuality and private identity in a totalitarian state is worthwhile.
The figure of the “magician” introduced in Part 1 will remain an important figure in the memoir. Nafisi does not give his real name for reasons of security, but the pseudonym she chooses to give him—“the magician”—reflects how she views him. For Nafisi, the magician is a person who creates his own kind of magic, the magic of maintaining free thought under a regime that wishes to crush any and all signs of dissent. The magician does not resist the regime actively: He is never described as engaging in open or covert political actions, nor does he try to publish dissident writings or publicize his critical views. Instead, he remains hidden in his “small apartment,” where he continues to cultivate friendships with other dissatisfied intellectuals and artists, keeping Iranian culture alive underground.
In claiming that the magician is “as dangerous to the state as an armed rebel” (34), Nafisi suggests that even seemingly passive non-compliance can be a meaningful form of resistance, just as the secret reading habits and small acts of “insubordination” engaged in by her and her girls provide a bulwark against the totalizing reach of the regime.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
Books & Literature
View Collection
Community Reads
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
Middle Eastern History
View Collection
New York Times Best Sellers
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Popular Book Club Picks
View Collection
War
View Collection
Women's Studies
View Collection