38 pages • 1 hour read
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Tonypandy history refers to a historical event that everyone insists is true but that didn’t actually happen. From Grant’s perspective, most recorded history is Tonypandy or, as Brent would say, “History is the bunk” (149).
The term “Tonypandy” isn’t mentioned or explained until midway through the novel, but the theme it represents is present from the very start.
In the earliest chapters, both the Midget and the Amazon declare with absolute certainty that Richard killed the Tower princes. By the end of the book, Grant and Brent build a convincing case for Richard’s innocence, yet the common belief in his guilt remains unchanged.
The book asserts that Tonypandy history plays an important role in a community’s collective identity. As Grant’s cousin observes, “when you tell someone the true facts of a mythical tale they are indignant not with the teller but with you. They don’t want to have their ideas upset” (138). Challenging a preconceived idea threatens that sense of collective identity.
However, the book’s final scene, when the Amazon admits Richard has a pleasant face after seeing his portrait in a new light, suggests that factual truth will eventually triumph over subjective truth.
Part of Grant’s job as a detective is to discover the motive for each crime he investigates. Motive is rooted in the character of the criminal. His main objection to standard history books is that they take no account of personality when describing a historic figure’s actions. Rather, they “see history like a peepshow; with two-dimensional figures against a distant background” (151).
After launching his investigation, the first thing Grant attempts to do is identify Richard’s values and personality. Ultimately, he believes that the murder of the Tower princes can only be solved by understanding the type of person capable of such a crime.
Grant is repeatedly stymied in his attempts to understand Richard because none of the authors he studies share his belief in the connection between character and behavior.
Grant frequently complains about a lack of common sense not only in the authors he reads but also in the people surrounding him.
He archly observes that his landlady refuses to use any of the expensive purses he’s bought her as gifts over the years. She only wears her good blue hat to royal celebrations. This behavior highlights Mrs. Tinker’s irrational thriftiness.
Grant talks about the criminal mind and its inability to reason from A to C. He then compares this failing to the behavior of the historical authors he’s been studying. They bend over backward trying to make historical facts fit their assumptions. Historians, like criminals, want to have their cake and eat it too. Neither uses logic to reach a conclusion.
The detective is particularly contemptuous of Great Minds. These illustrious people gullibly accept known facts without first employing a reality check. Grant thinks they ought to know better.
Grant, himself, is guilty of unreasoning credulity by initially accepting the hearsay evidence of historians. When he finally thinks like a detective and applies common sense to the facts at hand, he makes a breakthrough in his investigation.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: