logo

55 pages 1 hour read

The Invisible Heart: An Economic Romance

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2001

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 17-21Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 17 Summary: “Swimming with the Tide”

Sam wakes from a nightmare in which Laura is teaching a class on Ayn Rand and Charles Dickens. He is giving a presentation on the positive effects of capitalism regarding poverty. In the nightmare, Laura judges him, and the class accuses him of heartlessness. When he wakes, he realizes he is anxious about the gathering at Laura’s house and calls his sister, Ellen, for advice. She tells him to try to enjoy the challenge of swimming against a current, rather than allowing people to get under his skin.

He goes to Laura’s apartment and meets six of her friends from Yale. The evening focuses on a television show about a greedy businessman who’s taken down by an idealistic government worker. Sam, as Laura had predicted, is frustrated and irritated by the simplistic plot of the show. However, when quizzed about the economics, he decides to pretend he’s like her friends. He says the opposite of his actual views, and everyone seems to like him as a result.

After the guests leave, Laura is quiet, and Sam pushes her for praise for his agreeableness. Rather than grateful, she’s angry. She hates that Sam lied to her friends. Sam explains his thinking, that he wanted to see what it was like to get along with everyone instead of arguing all the time. And, he says, how can he possibly defend his ideas when the show created a fictional environment that intentionally paints business in the worst possible light. When Laura says it’s only a television show and she doesn’t know why it bothers him so much, he sets up a different show, one which highlights all the potential ills of English teachers. In his example, she watches the show with a bunch of parents who ask her about the accuracy of the bad behavior in the show. She must admit that some English teachers do some of the nasty things in the show. But essentially none do all of them, and most do none of them. If she’s aggravated and feels it’s deeply unfair and inaccurate, everyone responds that it’s just a show, and she shouldn’t get so worked up about it.

Laura still thinks Sam’s reaction is extreme. He continues to explain that the show is entirely one-sided. More importantly, though, his perspective is non-existent in popular culture. There is no alternative to Charles—a CEO who does good because that is in the best interests of the company. There is no show that espouses the virtues of capitalism with the nuance that Sam understands. So, viewers like Laura and her friends have their views reinforced but never refined or challenged.

Laura asks about George. Sam expresses sympathy and empathy for people like George. Laura asks how Sam can defend a system that allows men like Charles to disenfranchise men like George. He asks what she would do in Charles’s position. She would keep the plant in Ohio. Sam explains the various consequences of that—largely that competitors wouldn’t be so compassionate, the company would fail, and Matalon would still slowly die.

He explains that individual businesses with a single owner can and often do show more compassion. The responsibility, though, of the CEO is to the shareholders who depend on the continued success of the company. The CEO isn’t spending his own money or losing his own money when he makes choices that short the profits of the company, he’s losing the money of the shareholders and investors. He continues to explain the perspective of continued success at the expense of individual workers, or factories even by using a metaphor of wood in the winter to profit for a corporation.

They return to the show: What, Laura asks, would Sam say to George? That profit was worth his job and his future. Sam would likely say very little to George because men in his position are understandably angry and the larger good is meaningless from George’s position. However, the argument Sam would offer is that George wouldn’t want to live, and certainly wouldn’t want his children to live, in a world where that factory never closed. The potential innovation that is lost and the increase in the quality of life that is lost, Sam argues, in a stagnating system is a much larger evil than the closing or relocating of factories.

Laura says the difference between Sam and Laura is that she cares about the losers, and he cares about the winners—giving gifted people the most opportunities to excel. He concedes that he cares about the winners, but he argues that he also cares about the losers. When gifted people excel in a capitalist system, he argues, the benefits are widely reaped. Not just by the originator of the capital, but by the customers, employees, and even sometimes other businesses. He uses Wal-Mart as an example of the power of innovation to create wealth widely, not just from the top down.

Sam sits down, exhausted, and apologizes for being dishonest with Laura’s friends. But, he explains, in a single hour, the best he could have done was convince them that he was as bad as Charles. He says, “I need six months to be understood, not sixty minutes” (211). Laura thinks for a moment and teases him, which breaks all the tension and increases the intimacy between them. After another kiss, Laura tells him he needs to go home. As he walks toward home, he thinks of the day to come, his last class at the Edwards School.

Laura tries to sleep but can’t stop thinking of Sam. She is unsure of the wisest course, given that he might be leaving the school and the differences in their worldviews. She can’t believe that he’ll leave without a fight—it doesn’t seem to match with passionate man she’s come to know.

Chapter 18 Summary: “Last Class”

Sam enters the classroom on the last day of classes, which is likely to be his last day at Edwards as well. He is tired but introduces the lesson on environmental regulation. He surprises the students when he asks whether they believe he is for or against environmental regulations and reveals he isn’t opposed to them.

He gives an example that seems initially unrelated—prisoner ships to Australia. They were inhumane, with many prisoners dying on the voyage. British citizens were bothered by this, so the government attempted to fix the problem. Ultimately, the only solution that worked was the pay the private captains only for the prisoners who disembarked alive in Australia. He explains the connection to the environment with emissions permits. If a power plant is required to install specific equipment, the costs of that is passed on to the consumer, but there’s no incentive to innovate and reduce pollution further. However, if a plant must purchase permits based on how many tons of emissions, they want to produce they have an incentive to innovate and find ways to reduce their pollution themselves.

Sam tells the class that governmental regulations can make sense and work in cases where no one and/or everyone shares ownership of something, like the ocean or the air. The free market works, says Sam, because of private property. Rights to private property harness self-interest, and each person cares for their own property. The problems arise largely when something is hard to own, which is why governmental regulation can become useful, so long as it considers the power of self-interest. He uses a story of how the Zimbabwe government gave ownership rights of elephants to villages. As a result, they protected the elephant population, and Zimbabwe saw growth in elephant populations when across the rest of the continent those populations were in decline.

He tells the class about a trip he took to Yellowstone where he saw elk as he hiked with friends. He believed at the time that those elk highlighted the wildness of the park. But on further research he discovered that eliminating wolves from the park at the turn of the 20th century significantly affected the entire ecosystem. He tells them to remember the lesson of the elk, that to make one small change with the best of intentions can have long-reaching unforeseen consequences.

He leaves the students with a final thought on the nature of economics, how it is not concerned with money but with how to view the world and how to understand the choices available. He tells the students he is leaving the school without appeal, that he’ll miss them, and that he’s enjoyed teaching them. The students slowly file out, and he asks Amy to stay. It was Amy who left the envelope outside his door months ago. He returns it to her. She says, tearfully, that she knew her father was involved with Sam’s dismissal and thought the documents would help. He says they would have, but that they aren’t his to use. He wishes her well and asks her to keep in touch. When she leaves, he surveys his classroom, sits at his desk one last time, and begins to pack his things.

Chapter 19 Summary: “Repairing the World”

Sam and Laura enjoy a picnic lunch near the Jefferson Memorial. They discuss Jefferson and the origins of the country. Then Sam tells Laura what happened with his job at Edwards school. Amy’s father, a prominent progressive senator and member of the school board, initiated an investigation into Sam’s teaching. The claim was that he was biased in his presentation of information and was attempting to convince the students of his worldview rather than teaching them economic theories and principles.

Laura asks when he’ll appeal, and he says he’s leaving the school instead. Laura is offended at the unfairness of his leaving. He explains that he’s had two opportunities to fight it and turned them both down. The first was Amy giving him receipts from a hotel either demonstrating the senator was having an affair or that he was meeting with unsavory people. Sam couldn’t justify using them, so he returned them. He also cancelled the appeal hearing because he knew he wouldn’t win. Laura asks why not give a statement of his principles, and he says he didn’t know whether he could stay calm, so he chose to try to accept the decision.

The thing that made him angriest, he tells Laura, was the claim that the class was pro-business. He draws a strong distinction between pro-capitalism and pro-business. His position as pro-capitalism is directly tied to the consequences of governmental and non-governmental actions. Business plays a major part in creation and innovation, but ultimately allowing businesses to operate with minimal regulation is about an understanding of the self-regulating effects of the market, rather than an affection for business itself.

In the discussion of whether the school’s decision is fair, and whether Sam has made the right choice not to fight it, they discuss anti-discrimination law and the general value of law. In most cases, Sam argues, laws have long-reaching unintended consequences. Therefore, his ideal society has precious few laws, only those required to maintain a society relatively free from violence and theft. Laura listens, and then asks what she can do to make the world a better place if not go to law school. Sam answers that she can take all nature of individual steps that make the world better. That if she actively works to make the world what she wants it to be by investing her time, energy, and compassion into it, she’s likely to see much higher returns than if she advocates for a law requiring or banning certain things.

When Laura says that they’re back to seeing the world differently, Sam says he hopes they’ve moved forward. No longer debating but discovering and exploring. They walk hand-in-hand around the Jefferson Memorial. They sit together in silence for a bit. She thanks him for telling her about leaving the school. She tells him she likes his contrarian nature, and that she’ll miss him at school. She asks him to accompany her to the senior skit night.

Chapter 20 Summary: “Show Time”

The senior skit night is a tradition at the Edwards school and typically contains jokes and performances by the seniors poking fun at teachers. Every year it is overseen by a teacher, and this year Laura is the advisor. Sam stands with her while the students impress with their wit and talents. At the end, after the applause, they have an encore performance. To the tune of “If I Only Had a Brain” from The Wizard of Oz, they literally sing Sam’s praises as well as critique the administration’s choice. The principal is incensed, but Sam has already left, and Amy makes sure the audience knows Laura had no knowledge of the song.

Chapter 21 Summary: “Spare Change”

Three months after graduation, Laura is at the subway station escalator. Fast Eddie asks her for change, and she gazes into the distance for a moment before dropping $1 into his hat. She hears Sam’s voice repeat her question of a year before, she smiles and returns his answer. They ride the train together and discuss what’s happened over the summer. Sam went to see his sister and eventually decided to come back when he received a video of the song and a letter of explanation from Laura. She still feels terrible that he was the centerpiece of the show when she’d told him he’d be left out of it. She asks his plans, and he says he’ll substitute while he looks for more regular work. And he wants to “woo” (255) Laura if she’ll let him. She flirtatiously teases him, but when he quotes Robert Burns to her they pick up naturally where they left off months before.

Chapters 17-21 Analysis

Ellen’s metaphor of swimming against the current informs Sam’s choice to be dishonest with Laura’s friends frames Sam’s largest internal conflict. Sam’s realization at the dinner with Laura that he cares what she thinks of him causes him to be more invested in pleasing her friends. Although up to this point Sam has appeared to be comfortable in his role as contrarian, even as it threatens his job, to keep consistent with his principles his feelings for Laura challenge that. Ellen tells him: “Instead of feeling sorry for yourself, revel in it. Remember, ‘Only a dead fish swims with the tide.’ Enjoy fighting the current” (189). When faced with the frustration and insult of the television show, however, Sam decides, “Pretend you’re one of them” (191), and tells them what they want to hear. When Laura confronts him about it later, he says “I wanted to see what it was like to be a dead fish” (193), returning to his sister’s metaphor. The profound element of the metaphor is that it’s a universal: Everyone has something they care sufficiently about which enlivens them, and to betray that in deference to others is a kind of death.

Abandoning the television plotline spotlights Art’s Ability to Forge Connections. The last scene the reader is provided from the show is Heather Hathaway’s attack. Laura fills in that she’s in a coma and not dead, but there is no resolution to that storyline. Instead, the discussion of the show stands in for the anecdotes that Sam typically uses to exemplify the concepts he communicates. Arguably, of course, the show isn’t art. Sam thinks of television as a general evil but embraces various other art forms. However, even though television may be low art, the depiction of George gives Laura her own specific anecdote to challenge Sam. That challenge is successful, though he doesn’t change his mind, Sam does agree that George’s story is realistic and very sad. Sam agrees that that is a drawback to a free market, that even if the CEO isn’t a “bad guy,” the George Sutherlands of the world exist. The connection between George and Laura deepens because of the emotional impact the show has on Sam, both his empathy for George and his frustration with the depiction of Charles.

The end of the novel resolves all the major plot questions, leaving no loose ends. The contents of the envelope are revealed in Sam’s conversation with Amy. Sam tells Laura why he’s being fired, and he explains why he won’t appeal or fight the decision. The falling action includes the senior skit show, and the unnarrated summer in which Laura misses Sam and Sam recognizes that what he really wants is to be with Laura. In turn, she realizes that her affection for Sam is not despite their debates, but in large part because of them. The only things that aren’t fully resolved are the philosophical questions raised during the debates. Laura has not been converted to “a free market romantic” (231) like Amy, and Sam is still confident in his affection for the free market. The hopeful ending of the novel indicates that their debates will continue and continue to enhance their relationship. The parallelism in the ending to Sam and Laura’s first meeting but in reverse shows that Sam and Laura’s relationship has reached its final stage of development.

Sam’s final class and his last debate with Laura demonstrate that Sam is a multi-dimensional person who is committed to consistency between his views and his choices. Although he is angry at the school’s decision, and sad to leave the school, fundamentally his world view won’t allow him to use that anger to challenge the school’s freedom of choice in employment. However, even though he is generally against government intervention, he does admit and even insists that there are some things that a free market can’t address. His explanation of the necessity of private property for self-interest in a free market to function properly also requires he show that for environmental concerns, private property and self-interest are insufficient. Community ownership of shared resources, like air or elephants, requires community rules. Just as he tells Laura “My definition of fair is ‘by the rules’” (236) when he explains why he supports the school’s right to fire him, even if he doesn’t personally like the result. Sam is a contrarian who is dedicated to consistency between his views and his actions, even when there are unforeseen consequences.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 55 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools